Articles by others on the same topic (1)

Form Champernowne constant by using concatenation to join the decimal representations of the positive integers after the decimal point. Champernowne proved in 1933 that this particular real number is a normal number in base ten. The construction is striking because its rule is completely explicit, while all finite words have the prescribed limiting digit block frequencies. [ref] Copeland and Erdős explicitly recall this result at the start of their own paper. [ref]
The first digits of Champernowne constant have the following exact counts, in digit order :
For the adjacent pairs fully inside that prefix, the words occur times respectively. Thus, for example, , which is about , rather than . The prefix ends partway through the decimal representation of ; the many leading ones in earlier positive integers help explain the visible imbalance.
Figure 1.
Exact digit and adjacent-pair frequencies in two prefixes of 100000 decimal digits
. The upper panels compare single-digit frequencies and list exact counts. The lower panels show all hundred overlapping pair frequencies, each with denominator , on the same vertical scale. The dashed line is the limiting reference for a normal number in base ten. In the periodic prefix, pairs through occur times each and occurs times; all other pairs are absent. Details.
These are finite counts, not a proof of the normal number theorem: a finite prefix can be followed by an all-zero tail. The theorem for Champernowne constant concerns the infinite limit, and establishes base-ten normality, rather than absolute normality. Nor do computations prove normality for familiar constants: the normality of Pi and Euler's number remains unproved, as discussed by Bailey and Borwein. [ref]