For a double pole at , differentiate the remaining holomorphic factor:
Since and , this simplifies to
On the selected branch and , giving
The residue theorem therefore gives
The equality uses the limiting contour integrals established in (c).
Use a counterclockwise keyhole contour around the positive real branch cut, with small radius and large radius . On the upper bank , so the integral tends to . On the lower bank , , giving the negative of the upper-bank integrand. That bank is traversed from to , so its contribution also tends to .
The outer circle contributes , since and its length is . The small circle contributes , since . Both vanish. Hence
The contour encloses both double poles but excludes the branch point.
Figure 1.
Keyhole contour around the positive real branch cut
. The upper bank runs outwards and the lower bank runs inwards. The large circle is counterclockwise and the small circle is clockwise; both poles lie inside the contour. The gaps are enlarged for visibility. Details.
Factor the polynomial denominator as . The numerator has values and at the two roots, so neither cancels. Therefore
The factor gives a branch point at zero, with local behaviour . Infinity is also a branch point, since in the coordinate the leading behaviour is . A single-valued branch requires a branch cut joining these points. Away from that cut and the two poles, the selected branch is holomorphic. For the integral below, use , putting the cut along the positive real axis.
A function is an analytic function at if it is holomorphic throughout some open neighbourhood of , equivalently if it has a convergent power series there. In real components , continuous first partial derivatives in a neighbourhood together with the Cauchy-Riemann equations
throughout that neighbourhood are sufficient, and for an analytic function they hold there. Satisfying these equations only at the single point is not enough to establish analyticity in a neighbourhood.
Apply the product rule to the vector field :
The gradient cross terms cancel. Integrating and applying the divergence theorem with outward unit normal proves Green's second identity:
Choose the Dirichlet Green function with and on . Taking and using the Dirac delta distribution, the left side becomes while the second boundary term vanishes. Hence
The plus sign is tied to the convention , whose free-space fundamental solution is negative in three dimensions. The singularity may equivalently be handled by excising a small sphere about before applying the smooth identity.
Treat each angular Fourier mode independently. Boundedness at the axis excludes the negative radial powers and the logarithm inside; decay at infinity excludes the positive powers, constant and logarithm outside. For the cosine mode write
Continuity at gives . The jump of the normal derivative is then
Thus and . The sine mode has the same relation with . Therefore the potential of a charged cylindrical shell with angular Fourier data is
There is no angular mean term: the given surface charge density has zero average. The interior constant is zero because its boundary value must match the vanishing exterior mean. A nonzero mean charge per unit length would instead produce a logarithmic electrostatic potential, incompatible with the specified decay at infinity.
A single-valued potential must be -periodic in . For a separated solution , the Laplace equation in polar coordinates becomes
The periodic angular eigenvalue problem has , : its nonconstant eigenfunctions are . Negative gives exponentials that cannot be periodic, and gives only a constant angular factor. For , the radial Cauchy-Euler equation gives . At the two radial solutions are and . Superposition therefore gives
The expansion is interpreted on an annulus where the harmonic function is defined; particular boundary conditions determine its constants and convergence region. Single-valuedness is essential: allowing a cut in the angular domain would also permit nonperiodic angular solutions.
For any cyclic subgroup of order , define
Both preserve products because scalar phases and planar rotations add their angles. Each sends the generator to an element of exact order , so both have trivial kernel and are faithful representations.
For , take : the generator images are and . For each order-two subgroup take its nonidentity element ; the images are and . For the trivial subgroup the unique images are and , which are faithful on a one-element group.
The one-dimensional representation of here must use complex scalars. There is no faithful one-dimensional real representation of , since a nonzero real scalar of finite order is or , and neither has order four. The two-dimensional representations above are real.
The complete subgroup list is
Thus there are ten subgroups: one trivial, five of order two, three of order four, and the whole group. The five order-two subgroups are mutually isomorphic. The two noncyclic order-four subgroups are mutually isomorphic Klein four-groups; neither is isomorphic to the cyclic group of order four.
For completeness, Lagrange's theorem permits only orders . An order-four subgroup containing or must be . Otherwise it can contain only and elements . The product of two distinct such elements is . To avoid generating or , their exponents must differ by two, giving exactly the two listed Klein four-groups. The order-two subgroups come from the five involutions and . This proves completeness.
The character of a representation is the trace of its representing matrix. For the rotation powers,
Each has a planar reflection block of trace zero and third diagonal entry , giving character . In the chosen element order,
Equivalently its values on the conjugacy classes , , , , are .
The relations in (a) reduce every word in the generators to , with and . These eight matrices are distinct: the elements have third diagonal entry and the elements have entry , while the four planar blocks are distinct in each family. Their multiplication is
with exponents reduced modulo four and two. This proves closure. The identity element is , the inverse of is , and each is its own inverse. Associativity is inherited from matrix multiplication, proving the group axioms. This is the eight-element dihedral group .
Set and for , consistently with the two labels specified in the question. The row-times-column multiplication table is
The rotation powers commute with one another, and commutes with exactly when is even. Two elements commute exactly when is even. These statements also check the symmetric portions of the table.
The upper-left block of is the planar rotation matrix , and fixes the third coordinate. Therefore
The diagonal entries of square to one, so . Direct conjugation gives , hence for every integer . Consequently
When , the last exponent is four, which is equivalent to zero because .

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact