Fenchel–Young inequality
ID: fenchel-young-inequality
The Fenchel–Young inequality says that every input and every slope obeywhere is any proper extended-real function and is its convex conjugate. No convexity assumption on is needed for this inequality: the defining supremum is at least the particular value . If either term on the left is , the inequality still holds, but cannot be an equality because the dot product on the right is finite.
For a proper convex function, equality is equivalent to the subgradient conditionTo see this, with finite, equality says that attains the supremum defining , so for every . Rearranging gives the subgradient inequality . Geometrically, the affine minorant touches at .
If the proper convex function is also closed, meaning its epigraph is a closed set, or equivalently it is lower semicontinuous, thenThe forward implication holds without closedness; the reverse one requires the additional hypothesis in general. Applying the equality criterion to relates to , and the Fenchel-Moreau theorem supplies when is closed. See Bertsekas, Convex Optimization Theory: A Summary, §5.4.1, Proposition 5.4.3 for precisely this distinction.
A concrete failure of the reverse implication occurs for the indicator functional of a constraint set of the open interval . Its convex conjugate is : the endpoint gives the supremum, even though it is excluded from the interval. At , , but , so equality fails and is empty. Closing the interval changes the endpoint value and restores equality there.
For the convex quadratic function , the Fenchel–Young inequality is , and equality holds exactly when . For the absolute value , finite equality requires at , where is the sign function; at every gives equality. These are exactly the subgradients of the absolute value, including its entire interval of slopes at the corner.
New to topics? Read the docs here!