James W. Deardorff was an atmospheric scientist whose numerical work helped establish large eddy simulation as a way to study turbulence. His 1970 study integrated three-dimensional equations for turbulent channel flow while representing subgrid effects through coefficients tied to resolved deformation. The primary paper identifies his affiliation as the National Center for Atmospheric Research.[ref]
A numerical study of three-dimensional turbulent channel flow at large Reynolds numbers by James W. Deardorff. Printed p. 453, byline, affiliation and abstract
The calculation used 6720 uniform grid intervals and compared computed flow statistics with experimental measurements. The reported agreement ranged from good to marginal. This made the unresolved-motion model testable against quantities beyond the appearance of an evolving flow: the paper examined eddy structure and the kinetic energy balance as well as statistical averages.[ref]
A numerical study of three-dimensional turbulent channel flow at large Reynolds numbers by James W. Deardorff. Printed p. 453, abstract: grid, comparison, eddy shapes and energy balance
An elementary example explains why those separate statistics matter. Two equally likely velocities and have mean and variance . A prediction that always returns has the correct mean but zero variance. Matching a mean velocity profile alone therefore cannot establish that a model captures turbulent fluctuations or their transport.
Deardorff's study illustrates a productive compromise: compute evolving resolved structures, model the missing influence with a subgrid-scale model, and compare predicted statistics with observations. Finer resolution and a different closure can change the prediction, so agreement remains a property of a specified calculation and test.
New to topics? Read the docs here!
