Millikan photoelectric experiment
ID: millikan-photoelectric-experiment
Robert Andrews Millikan's 1916 experiment used a magnetically turned wheel and rotary knife to expose sodium or lithium in vacuum. A surrounding copper-gauze/solid-copper collector caught Electrons; an electrometer recorded accumulated electric charge over thirty seconds at each applied voltage. He located endpoints graphically from photocurrent curves. Mercury spectral lines, selected by a monochromator and filters, controlled frequency; rejecting shorter-wavelength contamination protected the endpoint. An oxidized collector suppressed reverse emission for selected lines. A copper test plate measured the contact potential difference by a displacement-null method; a certified voltmeter set the electrical scale. He compared stable-surface sweeps with rapid alternating-frequency measurements to control drift. The slope tested ; the threshold required the contact correction. His gauge did not measure mercury vapor. Confirmation of the equation coexisted with his continued skepticism about localized light quanta.[ref]
A Direct Photoelectric Determination of Planck's h by Robert Andrews Millikan. §§2–3, pp. 361–367, Figs. 1–3; §4, pp. 372–375, Figs. 5–6; §5, p. 380; Theories of photo emission, pp. 383–385; publication verified by Caltech record 45t7b-bvc23: March 1916, Physical Review 7(3), 355–388
What Millikan photoelectric experiment controls and reads out
. Original functional reconstruction of the 1916 apparatus. Successive operations are separated and geometry rearranged; this is not a scale drawing. Source. Details.For a modern repetition of the logic, first establish electrical zero with the illumination blocked, characterize leakage, and verify the voltmeter scale independently of the presumed Planck constant. Scan several voltages near each endpoint rather than calling one noisy zero a cutoff. Hold the illuminated area and surface state fixed when varying light intensity; vary frequency independently when testing the slope. Repeating a reference frequency between other readings reveals time-dependent offsets. Agreement of a slope with tests an energy relation; it does not alone identify every microscopic step of photon absorption and escape.
New to topics? Read the docs here!
