Nested measurements are responses grouped inside larger units, with each measured object belonging to just one such unit. Three leaves within each pot give nested measurements; repeatedly reading one leaf gives another level of repetition. Either can yield clustered data. A common random effect can describe the shared influence of the containing experimental unit.
For the constructed pot example, label treatments by , pots within each group by , and leaves within each pot by . Consider the statistical modelHere is a leaf length, is its group expected value, is a pot random effect, and describes remaining variation among leaves and measurement error. Assume that all pot random effects are mutually independent, all remaining errors are mutually independent, and the two collections are independent of one another and of the randomization. These are explicit modelling assumptions, conditional on the assigned treatments; no normal distribution assumption is needed for the following variance calculation.
Two distinct leaf measurements in one pot share . Their covariance is , their individual variance is , and their intraclass correlation coefficient isMeasurements from different pots have zero covariance and are independent under the stated statistical model. Statistical independence therefore concerns the whole response structure, not just the fact that the measured leaves are different objects.
New to topics? Read the docs here!