A parabolic drag polar models drag coefficient as
The zero-lift drag coefficient supplies the intercept. In a simple finite-wing approximation, can represent lift-induced drag; fitted whole-aircraft values can include additional lift-dependent losses. The model is conditioned on a configuration and operating regime, rather than universally valid through aerodynamic stall.
The zero-lift drag coefficient supplies the intercept. In a simple finite-wing approximation, can represent lift-induced drag; fitted whole-aircraft values can include additional lift-dependent losses. The model is conditioned on a configuration and operating regime, rather than universally valid through aerodynamic stall.
Its dimensional form explains a useful speed tradeoff. In steady level flight let lift equal gravitational weight , with fixed mass density and wing area . Substitution of and yields
The first contribution grows with speed; the second decreases as the required lift coefficient falls. Differentiation gives the minimum-drag speed .
The first contribution grows with speed; the second decreases as the required lift coefficient falls. Differentiation gives the minimum-drag speed .
Minimizing required propulsive power instead gives
The minimum-power speed is therefore different from the minimum-drag speed in this model. For stipulated , , , and , the speeds are about and , respectively.
The minimum-power speed is therefore different from the minimum-drag speed in this model. For stipulated , , , and , the speeds are about and , respectively.
These are idealized level-flight comparisons of required propulsive power. Engine efficiency, allowable lift coefficients and a speed-dependent polar can move an operational optimum. Relating the result to minimum sink speed in unpowered flight requires the additional shallow-glide approximation; it does not identify minimum fuel flow for an arbitrary engine.
New to topics? Read the docs here!