The minimum-drag speed minimizes the dimensional drag required for steady level flight at fixed gravitational weight, configuration and atmospheric conditions. It is not the speed at the smallest drag coefficient: changing speed changes the dynamic pressure and the lift coefficient needed to support the load.
For the parabolic drag polar , assume , and constant mass density . Substituting gives
The ideal finite-wing induced term motivates the quadratic dependence on lift coefficient; a measured whole-aircraft fit needs its own regime assessment.[ref]
The arithmetic-geometric mean inequality proves a global bound for every :
Equality holds when , so the two modeled drag contributions are equal. Equivalently, the optimum lift coefficient is .
An original model uses and when is in m/s and in newtons. It gives m/s and N, with 320 N from each term. At 30 m/s, the terms are 180 and about 568.89 N, giving a larger total of 748.89 N. The slower state nevertheless requires less mechanical power, illustrating the distinct minimum-power speed objective.
At fixed weight, minimizing drag maximizes the lift-to-drag ratio. Under a shallow, steady-glide approximation this relates to best glide through the air, whereas minimum sink speed concerns altitude loss per time. The FAA polar explicitly distinguishes the corresponding operating points.[ref] Wind, variable coefficients or an unattainable lift coefficient can change the applicable optimum. These model results are not flight instructions or substitutes for measured aircraft performance.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.