 Solution

Assume positive, pairwise distinct masses and generic nonzero $\omega ,\lambda$. Let $p_{x_i}=m_i{\dot{x}}_i$, and similarly for $y,z$. The three uncoupled $x$ oscillators each conserveUniform translation of all $y_i$ conserves $P_y={\sum }_i{p}_{y_i}$. The $z_1,z_2$ interaction permits their common translation, while $z_3$ is entirely free, giving two independent momenta $P_{z,12}=p_{z_1}+p_{z_2}$ and $p_{z_3}$. The interacting $z_1,z_2$ subsystem is autonomous and has its own conserved energy. A useful basic collection is thereforeThe total energy is generally not conserved. With $\kappa =\lambda (m_1-m_2)$, its derivative is $\dot{H}=-\kappa \sin (\kappa t)U_{12}(y_1-y_2)$, which is generically nonzero.

Unequal masses do not remove every rotation charge in the oscillator sector. Put $X_i=\sqrt{m_i}{x}_i$, $P_i=p_{x_i}/\sqrt{m_i}$. This is a canonical transformation and makes that sector an isotropic harmonic oscillator. Its rotations conserveThese mass-weighted oscillator symmetries exist already at distinct masses. The energies and three rotation charges are not all functionally independent; the three-oscillator sector has at most five independent time-independent integrals on regular trajectories.

There are further simple explicitly time-dependent constants, such as $x_i\cos \omega t-({\dot{x}}_i/\omega )\sin \omega t$ and $x_i\sin \omega t+({\dot{x}}_i/\omega )\cos \omega t$, and center-of-mass boost constants. For example $MY-t{P}_y$ is constant for $M={\sum }_i{m}_i$ and $Y={\sum }_i{m}_i{y}_i/M$. These illustrate why an unrestricted raw number of conserved functions is not meaningful.