Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-linear-algebra-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2017/1/b/iii/solution

Write . Part (ii) identifies the first superdiagonal block exactly:
where is the formal derivative. Thus the candidate is . If the irreducible polynomial has , its polynomial degree makes and coprime. Equivalently, is a separable polynomial. This includes every irreducible polynomial over a field of characteristic zero, and every irreducible polynomial over a perfect field.
Under this separability hypothesis, Bézout's identity for polynomials gives . Evaluating at proves that is an invertible matrix. Moreover, has zero diagonal blocks, because . It is therefore a nilpotent matrix with . The only product of strictly upward block steps that reaches block uses the first superdiagonal every time, so
For , the corresponding assertion is simply . The block upper triangular matrix has
The minimal polynomial divides this characteristic polynomial. Since is an irreducible polynomial, it must be a power of ; the exact nilpotency index just found forces
The arbitrary-field qualification is necessary. In the rational function field , take . This is an irreducible polynomial: a square of a rational function has even order of vanishing at , while has odd order. Its formal derivative is zero. With ,
The off-diagonal block in is zero, and , rather than . No alternative polynomial coprime to could represent that block: would imply . Thus the printed coprimality claim fails as stated over a general field.
There is also a precise general replacement. In characteristic , let be the largest power for which , so that ; set in characteristic zero. Irreducibility of implies that is an irreducible polynomial, so and are coprime. The binomial theorem in characteristic gives . Expanding , with the coefficients equivalently supplied by the Hasse derivatives, gives
where commutes with and is a block upper triangular matrix whose diagonal blocks are . These blocks are invertible by Bézout's identity for polynomials, since . Thus is invertible, and
The same characteristic polynomial and divisibility argument now prove the corrected arbitrary-field answer:
This is the minimal polynomial of a companion block chain; recovers the intended separable case.

New to topics? Read the docs here!