Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2001/iii/paper-22/6/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 22 6 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The entire term structure is naturally indexed by observation time and maturity. Work under a risk-neutral measure and let be the instantaneous forward rate, with . Define the short rate , the bank account and the zero-coupon bond priceAn arbitrary Gaussian mean and covariance need not make these bond prices consistent. Absence of arbitrage requires the discounted traded bonds to be martingales under a suitable equivalent measure. We derive the constraint explicitly.
Consider the Gaussian forward-rate field with deterministic mean and centered Gaussian random field satisfyingThe maturity kernel is symmetric, and its increments in the first parameter must be positive semidefinite kernels. Assume continuity, separability and sufficient integrability for the following mean-square integrals and maturity derivatives. This covariance gives independent observation-time increments, while permitting correlated fluctuations across all maturities. The filtration contains the history of the whole observed forward curve.
For a fixed maturity , collect the past short rate and the present curve into the integrated Gaussian forward-rate processThen . Its centered Gaussian variance isFor and an observed field coordinate with , the covariance of with it is zero: the integrand isThe uncorrelated jointly Gaussian variables are independent principle therefore makes the increment independent of the earlier field filtration. Its variance is , since the same covariance calculation gives . Conditional Gaussian exponential expectation now givesHence the exact bond-martingale condition isDifferentiating in maturity, using symmetry of the covariance, gives the Gaussian forward-rate covariance drift restrictionThis is necessary and sufficient. For sufficiency, the derivatives of the half-variance identity agree by the displayed restriction. Its integration constant also agrees at , becauseThus the full identity follows for every , and the conditional expectation calculation proves a true martingale, not merely zero formal drift. The initial mean fits the observed initial curve exactly; thereafter the mean adjustment is fixed by the covariance.
If is time-differentiable, the forward drift is . Writingwith deterministic finite- or Hilbert-space factor loadings gives the Heath-Jarrow-Morton modelWith , Itô formula independently verifies bond drift . Finite-factor models give low-rank maturity correlations; a genuine random field or an infinite factor space permits a much richer covariance structure. Gaussian forward rates and short rates may be negative, although the exponential bond prices stay positive. Under a physical measure, a Girsanov theorem market-risk-premium change adds to the forward drift; deterministic premia preserve Gaussianity, whereas arbitrary adapted premia need not.
For a concrete two-parameter example, let be a standard Brownian sheet, so . The restriction givesIndeed . This demonstrates directly how a Gaussian random field determines the compensating forward drift.
For the one-factor constant-volatility case, , the Constant-coefficient Ho-Lee model hasandThese follow by integrating the explicit curve, not by assigning the short-rate drift independently. Exponentially decaying loadings instead give a Gaussian mean-reverting Hull-White model, with bond-rate loading .
A practical advantage is an explicit Gaussian bond-option formula. For a call of strike exercised at on a bond maturing at , use the T-forward measure with numéraire . The forward bond ratio has a lognormal distribution under that measure, with remaining integrated varianceIts martingale property makes the conditional log mean . Evaluating the positive-part lognormal integral givesFor , the limit is . The forward measure accounts for the stochastic short rate; discounting by one deterministic interest rate would generally be wrong. Calibration selects a positive-semidefinite covariance structure fitting observed rate co-movements and option prices, with the no-arbitrage mean restriction imposed afterward. With more independent factors than the available traded bond exposures span, the market is incomplete and additional claims need a specified pricing measure or risk-premium model. The Gaussian field is therefore a flexible curve model with explicit consistency and pricing equations, rather than a claim that all possible rate risks are hedgeable.
New to topics? Read the docs here!