Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2003/iii/paper-40/2/i/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 40 2 i Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let count observed failures and let be the at-risk process, counting subjects under observation and still alive immediately before . Under independent censoring, a short interval of length has conditional expected failure count . The estimating equation obtained by replacing the count expectation by its observation is . Each distinct failure gives and , so the Nelson–Aalen estimator isThe same increment maximizes the local working likelihood for a Poisson distribution with mean : differentiating gives . The counting-process derivation explains why the risk set, rather than the initial sample size, supplies the denominator.
New to topics? Read the docs here!