Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2006/ib/paper-4/3f/solution

We first justify the maximum in the proposed supremum norm. If a null sequence is nonzero, choose an index with . All sufficiently late terms have absolute value smaller than , since . Hence the largest absolute value occurs among a finite initial set of terms, and is finite. For the zero sequence the maximum is zero.
The norm axioms now follow directly. The maximum is nonnegative and vanishes precisely when every coordinate vanishes. For a scalar , . For two null sequences, coordinatewise addition remains a null sequence and
Taking the maximum proves the triangle inequality, so this really is a norm on .
Let have a single in position . If , then . A convergent sequence in a normed vector space must be a Cauchy sequence, by the triangle inequality. These distances violate the Cauchy condition with, for example, . Thus does not converge in this norm, even though each fixed coordinate converges to zero.

New to topics? Read the docs here!