Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2007/iii/paper-9/1/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 9 1 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Assume is nonempty, as is necessary for a probability measure to exist. Give its isometry group the uniform metricEvery distance-preserving self-map of a compact metric space is onto. Indeed, if , then , and for the iterates satisfy . This infinite separated set contradicts compactness. Consequently is a group under composition, with the identity and inverses again isometries.
The metric is invariant under both left and right multiplication: left invariance uses preservation of distances, and right invariance uses surjectivity. Inversion is an isometry for , and proves continuity of multiplication. Moreover, is compact. A sequence of isometries has a subsequence converging at every point of a countable dense subset of , by a diagonal argument. Their common Lipschitz constant and finite epsilon-nets of make this subsequence uniformly Cauchy. Its uniform limit preserves distances and is onto by the preceding argument. Thus is a compact metrizable topological group. A transitive group action means that for every some has .
We construct the invariant Borel probability measure directly. The Hall marriage theorem says that a finite bipartite graph with equal-sized vertex classes has a perfect matching precisely when every subset has at least neighbours in . Its following consequence is useful. If are -separated subsets of maximum cardinality in a compact metric space, join points whose distance is less than . If some had fewer than neighbours, replacing those neighbours in by would produce a larger -separated set. This contradicts maximal cardinality. Hence there is a bijection between and moving each point by less than .
Choose and maximum-cardinality -separated sets . Such sets exist: a finite covering by balls of radius less than bounds every separated set's cardinality. Fix and define the empirical probability measuresFor let , which tends to zero with by uniform continuity. For every , left invariance of makes another maximum-cardinality separated set. Match it to as above. ThenThe allowed compactness of probability measures on a compact metric space supplies a subsequence converging to in the weak-star topology. Passing to that limit for each fixed gives . The same subsequence works for every , since the displayed estimate held for all of them before taking the limit.
For uniqueness, put . For , right invariance of lets us match with . Transitivity therefore gives the uniform estimate for every . If is any invariant Borel probability measure, thenTwo invariant probability measures consequently differ on the integral of by at most , hence agree on every continuous function. Continuous functions determine Borel probability measures on a compact metric space, so the invariant probability measure exists and is unique.
New to topics? Read the docs here!