Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2008/iii/paper-1/5/b/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 1 5 b Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The topology needed here is the weak-star topology , meaning pointwise convergence on . With the literal weak topology , the claimed compactness is false. For example, is separable and . Its unit vectors have no weak cluster point: every coordinate functional forces a cluster point to have all coordinates zero, while the bounded functional has value one throughout. Thus the dual unit ball is not weakly compact. We prove the intended weak-star assertion in full.
Choose a countable dense set in the unit ball of . On defineEach term is at most , so the series converges. The triangle inequality is immediate, and forces equality on the dense set and hence on all of . It is therefore a metric. Convergence in this metric is equivalent to convergence on every : one direction follows from any individual term, and the other by bounding the series tail uniformly. Because , approximation of any unit vector by then gives convergence on all of . The same finite-tail and approximation argument for neighborhoods proves equality with the weak-star topology, not just agreement of its convergent sequences.
Given a sequence in this ball, diagonal selection gives a subsequence converging at every , since each coordinate lies in a compact disk. Uniform norm bounds then make it pointwise Cauchy at every . Define as the limit. Linearity passes to the limit, and , so . The subsequence converges to it in the metric. Thus this metric space is sequentially compact, hence compact, proving
New to topics? Read the docs here!