Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2009/iii/paper-74/1/ii/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 74 1 ii Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Neglect tube-end effects and use the localized flow with no imposed throughflow, as implied by the sphere being the only cause of motion. Extend the fluid velocity through the sphere by its rigid-body velocity. This extended field is continuous across the surface by the no-slip boundary condition and divergence-free both inside and outside. The divergence theorem therefore makes its total flux through a complete tube section independent of height. In sections far from the sphere the fluid is quiescent, so this total flux is zero.
At height cutting the sphere, let be the area of its circular slice and take upward. The translation contributes . The vertical component of integrates to zero over that circle because its first moments about the centre vanish. Hence the zero total flux for localized tube Stokes flow giveswhere for a falling sphere. Thus the net fluid flux is upwards in every section intersecting the sphere's interior, even though some fluid locally moves downwards. At a tangential section and the flux vanishes. The zero-total-flux condition is important: an imposed throughflow or appreciable open-tube end effects would change this argument.
New to topics? Read the docs here!