Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2010/iii/paper-4/1/ii/solution

For a finite group, define the Frattini subgroup by
the intersection is when there are no maximal subgroups, which for a finite group happens only for . A second definition is the set of non-generators: an element such that always implies .
If and , put in a maximal subgroup . Then , so . Conversely, if , some maximal subgroup omits it; maximality gives , although . This proves equivalence.
Every group automorphism permutes maximal subgroups, so is a characteristic subgroup, in particular a normal subgroup. Also
a proper would lie in a maximal subgroup containing both factors.
Set and take a Sylow subgroup of . For , normality of makes a Sylow subgroup of . Conjugating inside therefore gives the Frattini argument factorization . The preceding generating property forces . Thus every Sylow subgroup of is normal, and part (i) shows that is a nilpotent group.
Now suppose is a finite p-group. The normalizer condition makes every maximal subgroup normal: and maximality force . The quotient has no proper nontrivial subgroup, hence is cyclic of prime order; its p-power order makes that prime . Consequently every such contains
where the two factors are the commutator subgroup and the subgroup generated by pth powers. Thus .
The quotient is an elementary abelian group, hence a vector space over . If , extend the nonzero vector to a basis and choose a linear functional nonzero on it. Its kernel pulls back to a subgroup of index , a maximal subgroup omitting . Therefore , proving
The two factors in the last formula are multiplied; the superscripted expression in the TeX aid is not the formula printed in the PDF.

New to topics? Read the docs here!