Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2013/iii/paper-56/1/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 56 1 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Let , and let be the reduced mass. The stellar distances from the center of mass are and . For a circular Kepler orbit, , so summing the two orbital contributions gives the circular-binary orbital angular momentumThe separation is inside the square root. This also has the required dimensions of angular momentum.
For the homologous rotating collapse, label a fluid element by and its polar angle . Its enclosed mass is constant during stellar homology, as are the dimensionless density profile and the inertia coefficient . Conservation of angular momentum and solid-body rotation giveThe magnitude of the centrifugal acceleration is , while the Newtonian gravitational field has magnitude . ThereforeUsing only the radial component of centrifugal force replaces by and leaves the scaling unchanged. The centrifugal force vanishes on the rotation axis; the central point is understood through the limiting field rather than a ratio of two zero forces.
At the equator of the cloud, critical rotation of a spherical cloud means , where . ConsequentlyImmediately after the first fission, each daughter has mass and radius because the spheres touch. Their orbital moment of inertia is , while their combined spin moment of inertia is . With a common spin and orbital frequency , the synchronous fission model for binary formation givesThe common frequency can change during fission; corotation requires equal instantaneous frequencies, not an unchanged frequency from before the rearrangement. Equating the two values of yieldsFor a nonzero positive inertia coefficient, the necessary and sufficient condition in this algebraic model for isFor example, a moment of inertia of a uniform solid sphere has and gives ; it fails the required compact-fission condition. A sufficiently centrally concentrated cloud can have smaller .
For the next collapse, neglect exchange of spin with the unchanged outer orbit, so each daughter's spin angular momentum is separately conserved. Immediately after the first fission that spin isFor a daughter of mass to reach critical rotation of a spherical cloud at radius , the same relation gives . HenceEquivalently, its centrifugal-to-gravity ratio starts at when its radius is and reaches one after contraction by a factor four. Applying the same fission rule to this daughter produces an inner pair with separationCorotation at this second fission is local to each newly formed inner pair; it is not a single common frequency for the entire four-star hierarchy.
This spin assumption matters. If tidal locking instead kept each shrinking daughter synchronized to the fixed outer orbital period throughout the intervening collapse, its angular velocity would remain fixed. Its centrifugal-to-gravity ratio would then scale as and decrease, so it would never reach the proposed second fission. This is a counterexample to extending the corotation assumption through the whole contraction. The printed ratio describes the separately spin-conserving interpretation of the repeated fission hierarchy.
The model can generate a compact hierarchy algebraically, but is not a general physical account of multiple-star formation. In the allowed range , one has , suggesting well-separated inner and outer scales. However, rapidly rotating gas deforms, touching daughters are tidally distorted, and pressure, gas flows, dissipation and spin-orbit torques cannot generally be ignored. The assumed identical profiles, equal mass splits, instantaneous corotation and later torque-free contractions are restrictive. Star formation can involve gravitational fragmentation and redistribution of angular momentum; the toy budget neither proves that fission occurs nor predicts the population of real multiple systems.
New to topics? Read the docs here!