Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2016/ia/paper-4/10b/solution

For unit mass, the inverse-square force has potential energy , with zero potential at infinity. Conservation of angular momentum gives . Differentiate the polar equation of the Kepler orbit:
Consequently the total mechanical energy is
where . This also explains the sign distinction between an elliptic orbit, a parabolic Kepler orbit, and a hyperbolic Kepler orbit.
At the original periapsis, the parabolic Kepler orbit has , , and purely tangential speed . Thus
The outward radial impulse has zero moment about the Sun, so it preserves angular momentum and hence . Its additional velocity is perpendicular to the original velocity, so the new mechanical energy is . Applying the energy formula gives
For , the new orbit is a hyperbolic Kepler orbit; leaves the parabola unchanged.
To fix the orientation of the sketch, put the Sun at the origin, the impulse point at , and take the original motion there upwards. The new velocity is . The eccentricity vector is
It points towards the new periapsis, which is rotated clockwise through from the original periapsis direction. Thus, measured using the original polar angle , the new orbit is
In particular, the impulse point is already on the outgoing part of the new orbit and is not its new periapsis. The old parabola satisfies . Both orbits pass through and have the same focus, but the hyperbola's new periapsis axis is tilted.
Figure 1.
Original parabolic orbit and the orbit after an outward radial impulse
. Illustrative case , with distances in units of . The solid orange curve is the subsequent hyperbolic trajectory; its dashed continuation is the earlier part of the mathematical conic. The original velocity and radial velocity increment are shown at the impulse point.

New to topics? Read the docs here!