Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-year-2-of-the-natural-sciences-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2011/paper-1/5/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the year 2 of the natural sciences course of the University of Cambridge 2011 Paper 1 5 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-18
A square matrix is invertible precisely when its determinant is nonzero. Equivalent conditions are full rank, a trivial kernel, and zero not being an eigenvalue.
For a lower triangular matrix, the first row has only the possibly nonzero entry . A Laplace expansion along that row gives , where the remaining principal submatrix is again lower triangular. Induction from the one-by-one case yieldsThis proof includes singular triangular matrices; it makes no division by diagonal entries.
For the diagonal example, put . Its determinant is , and invertibility requires . Write the complex number as with . A nonzero purely imaginary determinant requires . ThusEquivalently ; the angle is understood modulo .
For skew-Hermitian matrices, reversing products under the conjugate transpose gives . ConsequentlyThe latter condition is vanishing of the anticommutator. A universal choice for the last request isIndeed , so the commutator of two skew-Hermitian matrices is skew-Hermitian.
New to topics? Read the docs here!