Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-physics-course-of-the-year-1-of-the-natural-sciences-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2014/paper-1/d12/solution

A travelling wave, for example , has moving constant-phase surfaces. A standing wave, for example , has stationary nodes and can be formed from two equal counterpropagating waves.
For the half-line finite well with , define and . The hard wall requires for and , so the general allowed forms are
At the finite step both and are continuous:
There is no requirement to match the derivative to zero across the infinite wall.
For a bound state , put . Normalizability excludes the growing exponential, leaving inside and outside. Matching their logarithmic derivatives gives
The exterior expression is equivalent to by rescaling its constant. Negative cotangent first occurs for ; all higher allowed intervals also have . Thus . Since , a normalizable bound state requires
This is also sufficient: on the lowest negative-cotangent branch, the two matching sides cross whenever . The printed non-strict inequality includes the threshold limit. At equality and the exterior is not square-integrable, so it is not itself a bound state.
For the helium mass and energy scale given, the limiting width is
Actual binding requires a width just larger than this threshold in the stated ideal potential.

New to topics? Read the docs here!