Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-physics-course-of-the-year-1-of-the-natural-sciences-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2019/section-b/8/f/solution

For a downward step potential, , the region on the right is classically allowed at every positive incident energy. The same matching calculation applies with
As , and . Hence
and the flux coefficients satisfy
This quantum reflection at a downward step occurs even though a classical particle would simply accelerate into the lower-potential region. The abrupt change in wavenumber causes strong reflected-wave interference.
Both this limit and part (d) give total reflection, but their probability amplitudes and spatial densities differ. At the upward-step threshold, and : an antinode meets the origin and the right-hand density stays finite while its propagation velocity vanishes. Here and : the incident and reflected waves nearly cancel at the origin, and the transmitted density vanishes while the right-hand propagation velocity remains finite. In both descriptions the incident probability amplitude is held fixed for comparison.
The coefficients above are limiting flux ratios for . At exactly the incident probability current vanishes, so directly dividing zero-energy fluxes would not define a scattering probability.

New to topics? Read the docs here!