Consequently the equation has the same form if the resultant physical force satisfies F′=RF. For a pure boost, this reduces to F′=F. More explicitly, if aforce is represented by afunction of positions, velocities and other physical data, those arguments and data must transform so that its primed value is Rtimes the old value. It is this condition on the complete dynamical model, not the typography of F=ma, that establishes covariance.
An instantaneous inverse-square interaction depending on the separation of two particles passes this test: their common boost cancels from the separation, and arotation rotates the forcevector. A resistance law F=−ζ(v−u) also passes when the medium's velocityutransforms with the body. In contrast, keeping F=−ζv in every boosted frame while silently resetting the same medium to rest changes the physical problem. That model has not been shown covariant by noting a′=a.
Likewise, the full Maxwell equations are not made Galilean covariant merely because some equation of particle motion is written asforce equals masstimesacceleration. The covariance of a framework has to be checked together with its interaction laws. Newton's own CorollaryV expresses the corresponding equivalence of uniformly translating, nonrotating systems for the mechanics under consideration.[ref]