Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-superconductivity-and-quantum-coherence-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2015/paper-1/1/d/solution
Past exam of the superconductivity and Quantum Coherence course of the University of Cambridge 2015 Paper 1 1 d Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-20
For a neutral condensate with order parameter , the superfluid velocity away from singularities is . Single-valuedness around a closed contour gives , hence quantization of circulation:The mass is that of the condensed object: an atom for a bosonic atomic superfluid, or a pair for a paired-fermion condensate. A nonzero winding cannot be continuously removed while the order parameter remains nonzero throughout a spanning region. A vortex allows its phase to wind while its amplitude vanishes in a core.
For a charged condensate, minimal coupling gives . ThusUsing and gives the fluxoid and flux quantization in a superconductor relation . The signs of oriented flux and winding depend on the signed pair charge; the magnitude of the elementary superconducting flux quantum is . Flux alone is quantized when the current term is negligible on a contour deep in the bulk. A thin ring or a contour near a core can instead require the full fluxoid.
In a neutral superfluid, vortex flow carries kinetic energy and angular momentum. Rotation can favor vortices because equilibrium minimizes the rotating-frame quantity . The core size is set by a coherence or healing scale. In a type-II superconductor, an Abrikosov vortex carries quantized magnetic flux and circulating supercurrent; its core scale is the coherence length and its magnetic screening scale is the penetration depth. Between the lower and upper critical fields, a vortex lattice can be favored. Flux pinning affects how that structure responds to current. Type-I bulk superconductors instead favor macroscopic normal/superconducting separation rather than the usual stable dilute Abrikosov-vortex regime.
New to topics? Read the docs here!