S. G. Parker is the first named author of the 1983 primary study of optical radiation passing through human nails, coauthored with Brian Diffey. The byline uses these initials. The study measured total transmission through thirteen autopsy toenails at fifteen wavelengths from 300 to 600 nm and reported decreasing transmission towards the shorter wavelengths.[ref]
The transmission of optical radiation through human nails by S. G. Parker and B. L. Diffey. Abstract and primary byline; British Journal of Dermatology 108, 11–16 (1983)
The apparatus joined a monochromator to an integrating sphere and photodiode. Selecting an illumination wavelength and collecting the light that emerges answer different experimental questions. In particular, light scattering can redirect transmitted light outside a narrow detector acceptance angle without absorbing it. The collection geometry must therefore accompany a stated transmittance.
Collection geometry in nail-transmission measurements can be illustrated with an original accounting model. Let be directly transmitted fraction, the remaining transmitted fraction, and the fraction of diffuse transmission collected by a particular detector. Its idealized response isFor stipulated direct and diffuse fractions of 0.04 and 0.08, total transmission is 0.12. A detector collecting one quarter of the diffuse component gives . The sample has not changed; the reported value changes because the collection differs. An integrating sphere is designed to collect light over many directions, although its ports, calibration and losses still matter.
An isolated nail plate experiment also separates plate transmission from the optical behaviour of living tissue underneath. These measurements do not by themselves determine nail-bed blood flow or the response of every living nail. The work offers a concrete example of defining the specimen, wavelength and detector collection before interpreting an anatomical covering as an optical filter.
New to topics? Read the docs here!