For the period lattice , define the Weierstrass elliptic function by
To prove Normal convergence of the Weierstrass elliptic-function series, let be compact and choose with on . For ,
The comparison series converges by the stated lattice-sum criterion. The Weierstrass M-test gives uniform convergence on ; since was arbitrary, the series converges locally uniformly away from . The locally uniform convergence of holomorphic functions makes its sum holomorphic there, and the displayed principal term gives a double pole at every lattice point.
The function is even and satisfies
The three nonzero two-torsion points are distinct modulo and each equals its own negative modulo . Therefore no two can have the same -value, so are distinct. Equivalently, is a degree-two branched map and each half-lattice point already occupies its fiber with multiplicity two.
For a transitive example, take the equianharmonic lattice
and define . Multiplication by preserves , so is a conformal equivalence. On the nonzero half-lattice points it acts by
because . Thus it acts transitively.
Put . The odd integer is an Euler pseudoprime to the coprime base when
where is the Jacobi symbol.
Let be the unit group of residue classes modulo , and partition it into the set of bases satisfying the displayed congruence and the set of Euler witnesses that do not. If , multiplication by maps injectively into : indeed, if and also lay in , then the multiplicativity of the Jacobi symbol would give
Cancelling the invertible congruence for would say that , a contradiction. Hence , so at least half of the coprime bases are witnesses.
It remains to construct one witness for every odd composite number . If is not squarefree, choose an odd prime number with . The Chinese remainder theorem gives a unit such that for the full power and modulo every other prime-power factor. The binomial theorem gives
Since , this is neither nor modulo , whereas the Jacobi symbol is always or . Thus is a witness.
If is squarefree and composite, choose distinct primes . By the Chinese remainder theorem, choose to be a quadratic nonresidue modulo and to satisfy modulo every other prime divisor of . Then , while , so the Euler congruence again fails. This proves the existence of an Euler witness for every odd composite integer.
For subgroups and an -representation , Mackey restriction formula is
Frobenius reciprocity states
Applying these with gives
The identity double coset contributes one exactly when is irreducible, and every summand is a nonnegative integer. This proves Mackey irreducibility criterion: the induced representation is irreducible exactly when is irreducible and every nonidentity double-coset summand vanishes.
Now take , , and . Then
the subgroup fixing both and . Conjugation by fixes every element of this subgroup, so the two representations appearing in the corresponding Mackey summand are both . Their inner product is positive because this restriction is nonzero. Hence the Mackey irreducibility criterion fails whenever is irreducible. If is reducible, induction preserves its direct-sum decomposition, so the induced representation is again reducible. Therefore is never irreducible for .

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.