Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 24F i Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 23F Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
For the period lattice , define the Weierstrass elliptic function byTo prove Normal convergence of the Weierstrass elliptic-function series, let be compact and choose with on . For ,The comparison series converges by the stated lattice-sum criterion. The Weierstrass M-test gives uniform convergence on ; since was arbitrary, the series converges locally uniformly away from . The locally uniform convergence of holomorphic functions makes its sum holomorphic there, and the displayed principal term gives a double pole at every lattice point.
The function is even and satisfiesThe three nonzero two-torsion points are distinct modulo and each equals its own negative modulo . Therefore no two can have the same -value, so are distinct. Equivalently, is a degree-two branched map and each half-lattice point already occupies its fiber with multiplicity two.
For a transitive example, take the equianharmonic latticeand define . Multiplication by preserves , so is a conformal equivalence. On the nonzero half-lattice points it acts bybecause . Thus it acts transitively.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 22I c Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 22I b Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 22I a Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 21I d Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 21I c Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 21I b Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 21I a Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 20F c Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 20F b Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 20F a Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 1H Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Let be the unit group of residue classes modulo , and partition it into the set of bases satisfying the displayed congruence and the set of Euler witnesses that do not. If , multiplication by maps injectively into : indeed, if and also lay in , then the multiplicativity of the Jacobi symbol would giveCancelling the invertible congruence for would say that , a contradiction. Hence , so at least half of the coprime bases are witnesses.
It remains to construct one witness for every odd composite number . If is not squarefree, choose an odd prime number with . The Chinese remainder theorem gives a unit such that for the full power and modulo every other prime-power factor. The binomial theorem givesSince , this is neither nor modulo , whereas the Jacobi symbol is always or . Thus is a witness.
If is squarefree and composite, choose distinct primes . By the Chinese remainder theorem, choose to be a quadratic nonresidue modulo and to satisfy modulo every other prime divisor of . Then , while , so the Euler congruence again fails. This proves the existence of an Euler witness for every odd composite integer.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 19F Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
For subgroups and an -representation , Mackey restriction formula isFrobenius reciprocity statesApplying these with givesThe identity double coset contributes one exactly when is irreducible, and every summand is a nonnegative integer. This proves Mackey irreducibility criterion: the induced representation is irreducible exactly when is irreducible and every nonidentity double-coset summand vanishes.
Now take , , and . Thenthe subgroup fixing both and . Conjugation by fixes every element of this subgroup, so the two representations appearing in the corresponding Mackey summand are both . Their inner product is positive because this restriction is nonzero. Hence the Mackey irreducibility criterion fails whenever is irreducible. If is reducible, induction preserves its direct-sum decomposition, so the induced representation is again reducible. Therefore is never irreducible for .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 18G b Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 18G a Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 17G iv Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 17G iii Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 17G ii Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 17G i Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.