For the standard basis vector , matrix multiplication selects the th column, so
Consequently
and the columns of are .
Suppose first that are linearly independent, and define
Then is invertible. The first columns of are the last columns of . By the Cayley-Hamilton theorem,
This is exactly the last-column rule for the companion matrix , so
Conversely, suppose , or , and write the columns of as . Comparing the first columns gives
Hence
Since is invertible, its columns are linearly independent. Taking therefore makes
linearly independent. Thus is similar to exactly when it has the stated cyclic vector.
For the sum :
  • In case (a), yes. If were differentiable at , then would be differentiable there, contrary to the hypothesis.
  • In case (b), no. Take
    Both are continuous and nondifferentiable at , but is differentiable.
For the product , the answer is no in both cases:
  • For case (a), take and . Then is differentiable at , is not, but
    has derivative at .
  • For case (b), take . Neither factor is differentiable at , whereas
    is differentiable.
Every displayed and is a continuous function and is nonzero at points arbitrarily close to , so the extra condition in the question is satisfied.

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.