ADM formalism 2026-10-14
The Arnowitt-Deser-Misner formalism expresses general relativity as constrained Hamiltonian evolution of a spatial metric and its conjugate momentum after a 3+1 decomposition of spacetime. Lapse and shift enforce the Hamiltonian and momentum constraints. For an asymptotically flat spacetime its boundary Hamiltonian gives the Arnowitt-Deser-Misner energy.
Arnowitt-Deser-Misner mass 2026-10-13
For an asymptotically flat stationary solution in its asymptotic rest frame, the ADM mass is the gravitational mass measured by the Arnowitt-Deser-Misner energy. It is fixed by the asymptotic metric falloff, not by a coordinate parameter's name. If spatial ADM momentum is present, distinguish the asymptotic energy component from the invariant mass obtained from the energy-momentum norm. For a static Schwarzschild-Tangherlini metric in dimensions with , the mass is ; the dimensional normalization is also reproduced by the Komar mass normalization in higher dimensions.
Differentiability of the gravitational Hamiltonian at spatial infinity Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-13
For asymptotically Cartesian spatial metrics , unit asymptotic lapse and vanishing asymptotic shift, the curvature term in the bulk gravitational Hamiltonian has variationThe surface variation is finite under the usual differentiable asymptotic falloff and is not removed by simply taking the boundary to infinity. Adding Arnowitt-Deser-Misner energy cancels it and makes Hamilton's equations well defined for allowed variations that need not fix the energy. On the constraint surface, the total Hamiltonian for that time translation equals the boundary energy.
Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-06
Using the lapse function , shift vector and spatial metric , the Legendre transform in mechanics of the Einstein-Hilbert action gives, in units ,Here and is the canonical momentum of the spatial metric. Varying lapse and shift imposes the Hamiltonian constraint and momentum constraint. An asymptotic time translation requires an Arnowitt-Deser-Misner energy boundary term. The bulk constraints generate gauge evolution; the nonzero asymptotic energy comes from the boundary.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 73 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use signature and . The mass here is the asymptotic rest-frame Arnowitt-Deser-Misner energy; it is useful to prove the stronger energy-momentum inequality. Interpret asymptotic flatness with its usual differentiable falloff, for example , , and extrinsic curvature , with the additional decay/integrability needed for the charges and integrations below. The complete nonsingular slice has no inner boundary. An oriented three-dimensional slice admits a spin structure. If there are several asymptotically flat ends, prescribe a constant spinor at the end whose mass is being measured and zero constants at the other ends.
Let be the future unit normal and write for the restricted spacetime spin connection. This is the Sen spinor connection, not merely the intrinsic connection :Omitting this term on a general slice would omit the ADM momentum. Choose anti-Hermitian, the spatial gamma matrices Hermitian, and . The commuting-spinor Dirac current is future causal and .
The Nester two-form supplies the needed integration identity. DefineHere multiple gamma indices denote antisymmetrized products. To derive the identity, differentiate , use , and antisymmetrize the two derivatives in the terms containing . Their commutator is the spinor curvature identityExpansion of the gamma products and the first Bianchi identity reduce this curvature contribution to an Einstein tensor contraction. It vanishes for the Vacuum Einstein equations. At a point in a normal-adapted orthonormal frame the remaining contraction isbecause . The normal-projection connection terms combine with the Einstein constraints. Thus, in vacuum, the Witten-Nester identity isAll norms here use the positive spinor norm on the spacelike slice. This derivation explains both the negative Dirac square and the condition needed to remove it.
Solve the Witten spinor equation with . The existence step is part of the argument. Extend the desired constant smoothly from infinity to a spinor and seek a decaying correction satisfying . The principal symbol squares to , so this is an elliptic differential operator. On the asymptotically flat ends, the Euclidean Dirac estimate and the weighted estimate from Hardy's inequality control the decaying correction; on a compact interior the usual elliptic estimate applies. Together these give the weighted Fredholm estimate for a decay weight between the constant and homogeneous Euclidean modes. A decaying homogeneous solution has zero boundary flux, so the integrated identity forces ; its zero limit at infinity forces . The formal adjoint has the same obstruction: with the conventions above is formally skew-adjoint. Consequently the decaying kernel and cokernel vanish, and the Fredholm alternative gives the required correction. Completeness and absence of an inner boundary are essential to this argument. This is the elliptic existence of a Witten spinor, rather than an assumption that an arbitrary prescribed spinor solves the equation.
For completeness, identify the asymptotic flux. Expanding the intrinsic spin connection in an asymptotically Cartesian orthonormal frame givesThe derivative of the decaying spinor correction has zero linear flux by antisymmetry of its gamma-matrix coefficient; quadratic correction terms decay away. Since the ADM energy and momentum have the respective and surface normalizations, the ADM boundary term of the Nester two-form isApply the divergence theorem to the complete slice and use . There is no inner flux to discard:Asymptotic constant spinors can be chosen with a future null current in any specified spatial direction. Choosing the direction of yieldsIn particular, the rest-frame mass is nonnegative. This proves the positive energy theorem in the vacuum setting rather than applying it as an unexplained bound.
If this mass is zero, then in the asymptotic rest frame and the inequality gives . The same identity with any nonzero has zero right-hand side. Smoothness then makes its integrand vanish pointwise:The spinor is nonzero, since it has nonzero asymptotic value. This is a spinor parallel along ; no time-parallel condition has yet been inferred merely from the integral.
For the static conclusion, it is possible to avoid assuming that the given slice was already orthogonal to the static Killing field. Because , repeat the zero-energy construction for four linearly independent asymptotic Dirac spinors. Parallel transport by the Sen spinor connection is invertible, so the resulting spinors form a basis everywhere on . Tangential curvature annihilates each of them:Thus as an operator. The six antisymmetric gamma products give a faithful Spinor representation of the Lorentz group, so for tangential . In a normal-adapted orthonormal frame this already kills the purely spatial and magnetic curvature components. The remaining components vanish by the Vacuum Einstein equations:Consequently the full spacetime Riemann curvature tensor vanishes on .
A static Killing vector field generates isometries and preserves this curvature. Its flow from the slice therefore propagates the vanishing curvature throughout the connected static development. Extend one of the spinors by spacetime parallel transport along these time orbits, so that . In coordinates propagated along the orbits, the spatial and temporal coordinate vector fields commute. Zero spin curvature then givesThe initial tangential derivative is zero, so it stays zero. This constructs the required nonzero spacetime parallel spinor; the initial parallel frame also removes any spin-holonomy ambiguity inherited from loops in . The static zero-energy parallel-spinor rigidity conclusion isAn equivalent check in a regular orthogonal static slicing is to write . The slice has zero extrinsic curvature. An intrinsic parallel spinor forces the spatial Ricci tensor to vanish by contracting its spin-curvature identity and using the invertibility of Clifford multiplication by a nonzero real vector. By three-dimensional curvature from the Ricci tensor, is flat. The static vacuum equation then makes the lapse gradient parallel, and asymptotic normalization forces . The temporal spin connection vanishes as well.
An explicit example is Minkowski spacetime, , where every constant spinor in a Cartesian tetrad is a spacetime parallel spinor and the ADM mass is zero. A singular inner boundary cannot be silently allowed in the proof: it would add a boundary term to the positive-energy identity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 311 3 a iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
For a closed universe, the spatial Cauchy hypersurface is compact without boundary. There is consequently no asymptotic surface term in the gravitational Hamiltonian. On solutions, the Hamiltonian constraint and momentum constraint giveThis is the vanishing canonical Hamiltonian of a closed universe: evolution generated by lapse and shift is a gauge transformation, and there is no asymptotic time-translation charge. It does not mean the local stress-energy tensor or Riemann curvature tensor is zero. In an asymptotically flat universe the same bulk constraint equations in field theory hold, but a boundary Arnowitt-Deser-Misner energy can be nonzero.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 311 3 a ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Perform the Legendre transform in mechanics, using . The trace contraction givesTo avoid differentiating a tensor density as though it were an ordinary tensor, set . Integration by parts with the Levi-Civita connection of givesafter dropping the surface term. AlsoTherefore the requested Hamiltonian isVarying the lapse function and shift vector imposes the Hamiltonian constraint and momentum constraint . The total canonical generator also contains multipliers for the vanishing lapse and shift canonical momenta. With an asymptotic boundary, surface terms must be restored to define the Arnowitt-Deser-Misner energy.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 311 1 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Choose the asymptotic time translation: , , with their derivatives , in asymptotically Cartesian coordinates. Use the usual differentiable falloff , , , and analogous falloff for allowed variations; impose the standard additional conditions needed for finite bulk integrals. These variations need not fix the Arnowitt-Deser-Misner energy.
Only the spatial curvature term produces the leading nonvanishing surface variation. Applying the variation of the Ricci scalar and applying integration by parts to its two derivative terms yieldsThe terms involving derivatives of the asymptotic lapse function, and the shift boundary terms, vanish under these falloff conditions. The displayed surface integral need not vanish: its integrand is and the area is .
Hamilton's equations require a Hamiltonian with a variation expressed by the bulk functional derivatives alone for the allowed variations. The unwanted term is exactly , so differentiability of the gravitational Hamiltonian at spatial infinity requiresIts variation cancels the surface term. On the constraint surface, . Restoring units inserts in the surface integral; the paper has set this factor to one. The original PDF has the standard equation ; the extra in the extracted TeX is a transcription error.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 311 1 iv Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
A closed spatial Cauchy hypersurface is compact and has no boundary. Thus there is no asymptotic surface charge, and the complete gravitational Hamiltonian is the integral of the Hamiltonian constraint and momentum constraint derived above. Both constraints vanish on solutions, givingThis is the vanishing canonical Hamiltonian of a closed universe: canonical evolution is generated by constraints and there is no asymptotic time translation whose boundary charge could define an Arnowitt-Deser-Misner energy. It does not require local matter energy densities or local curvature to vanish. With matter included, the corresponding total constraints still vanish.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2026 iii Paper 311 4 d Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
On a constant- asymptotically flat hypersurface, transform the large- spatial metric to asymptotically Cartesian coordinates. Its leading perturbation isThe rotation parameter first affects the spatial metric at orders that vanish in the Arnowitt-Deser-Misner energy surface limit. Direct differentiation givesHenceUsing in the ADM surface integral yieldsThus the Kerr parameter is its total mass in the rest frame.