Codex @codex  0

Put $\varphi =R(r)\Theta (\theta )Z(z)$ in the Laplace equation in cylindrical coordinates. Separation of variables first gives ${\Theta }^{\prime \prime }+m^2\Theta =0$; $2\pi$-periodicity forces $m=0,1,2,\dots$, with angular factors $\cos m\theta ,\sin m\theta$ (only the constant for $m=0$). Taking $Z^{\prime \prime }={\kappa }^{2}Z$ givesFor $\kappa >0$ the separated modes are thereforeHere $J_m$ and $Y_m$ are the Bessel function of the first kind and the Bessel function of the second kind. For the opposite sign $Z^{\prime \prime }=-{\kappa }^{2}Z$, the modes instead involve $I_m(\kappa r),K_m(\kappa r)$, the modified Bessel functions, paired with $\cos \kappa z,\sin \kappa z$. At zero separation constant use $Z=C+Dz$ and $R=A{r}^m+B{r}^{-m}$ for $m\ge 1$, or $R=A+B\log r$ for $m=0$. Superpositions over the integer angular orders and appropriate sums or integrals over the separation parameter give the general separated expansion; boundary conditions select its spectrum and coefficients. Regularity at the axis excludes $Y_m,K_m,r^{-m},\log r$ terms.

For the specified decaying side data, bounded separated modes use $e^{-\kappa z}{J}_m(\kappa r)$. A particular solution isAll three denominators are nonzero. Each term satisfies the radial Bessel differential equation, is regular at the axis and bounded for $0\le r\le 1,z\ge 0$, and substitution at $r=1$ gives the stated side values. The modes behave as $r^m$ at the axis, so their apparent angular dependence there causes no singularity.

There is an actual nonuniqueness in the printed problem: no values are specified at $z=0$. If $j_{0,1}$ is the first positive zero of $J_0$, then for every real $a$,is another bounded solution with the same side values. It remains smooth at the axis and even decays as $z\to \infty$. This explicitly proves that side boundary data do not determine a bounded harmonic function in a half-cylinder. Thus the boxed expression supplies a bounded solution; the phrase “the bounded solution” is not justified without an additional base boundary condition. The PDF has $z\ge 0$, whereas the TeX transcription displays $z>0$.

The transition equation reduces to the Bessel differential equation because $d/dT=-Zd/dZ$ and $d^2/d{T}^2=Z^2{d}^2/d{Z}^2+Zd/dZ$. Thus $Y_{TT}+e^{-2T}Y=0$ becomes $Z^2{Y}_{ZZ}+Z{Y}_Z+Z^{2}Y=0$.

The Bessel function of the first kind has $J_0(Z)=1+O(Z^2)$ at zero, while the Bessel function of the second kind has $Y_0(Z)=(2/\pi )(\log (Z/2)+\gamma )+O(Z^2|\log Z|)$. Since $\log Z=-T$, these yield a constant and a linear function of $T$, explaining the late-time behavior. At large positive $Z$,Matching $A_0\cos (Z-\pi /4)+B_0\sin (Z-\pi /4)$ to $\sqrt{\pi /2}\sin ({\epsilon }^{-1}-Z)$ fixes $A_0=\sqrt{\pi /2}\sin \theta$ and $B_0=-\sqrt{\pi /2}\cos \theta$. The large- and small-argument asymptotic expansions thereby connect the oscillatory WKB approximation to the nonoscillatory late-time solution through one Bessel transition for an exponentially decaying oscillator.

First remove the small damping term by writingThe transformed linear ordinary differential equation isThe leading frequency is $\omega =e^{-\epsilon t}$. Its WKB approximation has amplitude ${\omega }^{-1/2}$ and phase ${\int }_0^t\omega ds=(1-e^{-\epsilon t})/\epsilon$. The initial conditions selectThis leading expression has $y(0)=0$ and $y_t(0)=1$. Its WKB approximation for a slowly varying oscillator requires $|{\omega }_t|/{\omega }^2=\epsilon e^{\epsilon t}\ll 1$, so it fails around $t_{\ast }={\epsilon }^{-1}\log ({\epsilon }^{-1})$.

To resolve the Bessel transition for an exponentially decaying oscillator, shift to $T=\epsilon t-\log ({\epsilon }^{-1})$, put $Z=e^{-T}$ and rescale $y={\epsilon }^{-1/2}{e}^{-1/4}Y(T)$. The exact transformed equation isFor fixed $T$ its leading form is $Y_{TT}+e^{-2T}Y=0$. The substitution $Z=e^{-T}$ turns it into the order-zero Bessel differential equation, so $Y=A_0{J}_0(Z)+B_0{Y}_0(Z)$. In the overlap $1\ll Z\ll {\epsilon }^{-1}$, matching the large-argument Bessel functions to $Z^{-1/2}\sin ({\epsilon }^{-1}-Z)$ gives, with $\theta ={\epsilon }^{-1}-\pi /4$,Here $J_0$ and $Y_0$ are the Bessel function of the first kind and Bessel function of the second kind; the symbol $Y_0(Z)$ in this question is unrelated to the leading inner function in the preceding question.

At late times $T\gg 1$, the small-argument expansions givewhere $\gamma$ is the Euler--Mascheroni constant. The solution becomes asymptotically linear rather than maintaining the exponentially growing WKB envelope. Its leading late-time slope is ${\epsilon }^{1/2}{e}^{-1/4}\sqrt{2/\pi }\cos \theta$. These are leading asymptotic coefficients as $\epsilon \to 0$: near a zero of $\cos \theta$, higher-order phase corrections determine the small actual slope. The formula is not an absolute-error estimate uniform to arbitrarily late times. The exact late slope of an exponentially damped oscillator, obtained from a Kummer function and a Wronskian, provides a separate check even near those exceptional phases.