For two differentiable functions on an interval , their Wronskian is the functionThe order matters: exchanging and reverses the sign. For sufficiently differentiable functions, the Wronskian is the determinant .[ref]
1 Algebraic and Analytic Methods. NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions; §1.13(i), equation 1.13.4 and the following n-argument definition
The Wronskian measures whether the vectors and supply independent value-and-derivative data at that point. For real-valued functions, its absolute value is the area of the parallelogram they span. If a constant linear combination is zero throughout , then too. A nonzero Wronskian at even one point makes this pair of linear equations invertible and forces . Thus a nonzero Wronskian somewhere always proves linear independence of the functions on .
For an explicit example, the exponential functionssolve the same homogeneous linear differential equation on the whole real line: substitution gives and , respectively. Their Wronskian isFor the initial value problem , , the linear combination requires and . Hence , , and . The nonzero Wronskian makes the two initial conditions independently adjustable.
Independent exponential functions supply independent initial data, with Wronskian equal to the oriented parallelogram area
. Details. The stronger converse requires a common equation. Suppose solve with continuous functions on one interval . Then the functions are linearly independent if and only if their Wronskian is nonzero at one point, equivalently at every point. If , choose constants , not both zero, making satisfy . The superposition principle makes a solution of a differential equation for the same equation, and the uniqueness theorem for ordinary differential equations forces to be identically zero. This proves linear dependence.[ref]
The Wronskian. 18.03 Supplementary Notes by Haynes Miller; Chapter 15, The Wronskian, printed pp. 72–73: initial-data system (3) and the zero-or-nowhere-zero theorem
For arbitrary differentiable functions, an identically zero Wronskian need not imply linear dependence. Consider, on ,Both functions have three continuous derivatives. On each side of zero, is a constant multiple of , so ; at zero their values and first derivatives are all zero, so the Wronskian is zero there too. Nevertheless evaluated at gives , while evaluation at gives . Hence : these functions are linearly independent on the whole interval. There is no single constant multiplier valid on both sides of the common zero.
An identically zero Wronskian can coexist with linear independence when the common regular equation hypothesis is absent
. Details. These functions cannot both solve any equation with continuous functions throughout : even alone would contradict uniqueness because but is not identically zero. They do solve the singular equation , whose leading coefficient vanishes at zero. Dividing by gives only away from zero; Abel's identity cannot be applied across that point. The example pinpoints why checking the equation and its interval is essential before using a zero Wronskian to infer linear dependence.
Two differentiable functions can be linearly independent on a connected interval while their Wronskian vanishes everywhere. For example, let and . Both have a continuous first derivative, and their values and first derivatives vanish at zero. On either side of zero one of the functions is identically zero, so everywhere. Evaluating a constant linear combination at and forces .
The obstruction is that the two halves supply independent information without simultaneous nonzero value-and-derivative data at any point. For solutions of a common regular second-order linear differential equation, the uniqueness theorem for ordinary differential equations removes this possibility; Abel's identity gives the zero-or-nowhere-zero alternative for their Wronskian.
More precisely, let be solutions of a differential equation for the same homogeneous linear differential equationon an interval where are continuous functions. For any , Abel's identity givesOnly the coefficient of enters the evolution of the Wronskian. In an unnormalized equation , first use on an interval where and the coefficient ratios are continuous functions.[ref]
1 Algebraic and Analytic Methods. NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions; §1.13(i), equation 1.13.5 and the following coefficient-ratio explanation; stated there for analytic coefficients
The proof uses cancellation. Differentiating the Wronskian by the product rule and substituting the common equation givesMultiplying this first-order linear differential equation by the integrating factor gives . Since , the constant is , proving Abel's identity. This argument also covers without dividing by .
The exponential function is positive for real , so a real Wronskian either vanishes everywhere or has a fixed nonzero sign throughout . In the preceding example, and give immediately. If , every Wronskian of two solutions of a differential equation for that same equation is constant, regardless of . Thus Abel's identity can certify linear independence and find the denominator used in variation of parameters without explicit formulas for both solutions of a differential equation.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.

