The transition equation reduces to the Bessel differential equation because and . Thus becomes .
The Bessel function of the first kind has at zero, while the Bessel function of the second kind has . Since , these yield a constant and a linear function of , explaining the late-time behavior. At large positive ,
Matching to fixes and . The large- and small-argument asymptotic expansions thereby connect the oscillatory WKB approximation to the nonoscillatory late-time solution through one Bessel transition for an exponentially decaying oscillator.
First remove the small damping term by writing
The transformed linear ordinary differential equation is
The leading frequency is . Its WKB approximation has amplitude and phase . The initial conditions select
This leading expression has and . Its WKB approximation for a slowly varying oscillator requires , so it fails around .
To resolve the Bessel transition for an exponentially decaying oscillator, shift to , put and rescale . The exact transformed equation is
For fixed its leading form is . The substitution turns it into the order-zero Bessel differential equation, so . In the overlap , matching the large-argument Bessel functions to gives, with ,
Here and are the Bessel function of the first kind and Bessel function of the second kind; the symbol in this question is unrelated to the leading inner function in the preceding question.
At late times , the small-argument expansions give
where is the Euler--Mascheroni constant. The solution becomes asymptotically linear rather than maintaining the exponentially growing WKB envelope. Its leading late-time slope is . These are leading asymptotic coefficients as : near a zero of , higher-order phase corrections determine the small actual slope. The formula is not an absolute-error estimate uniform to arbitrarily late times. The exact late slope of an exponentially damped oscillator, obtained from a Kummer function and a Wronskian, provides a separate check even near those exceptional phases.