Bootstrap ratio bias with unequal cluster sizes arises because the pooled mean in a cluster bootstrap is a ratio with a random denominator. Let the empirical distribution over the observed groups assign mass to each pair of group size and response sum. One bootstrap replicate draws such pairs and computes . Its conditional expectation need not equal , even though the numerator and denominator averages are individually unbiased for their empirical means.
A second-order Taylor expansion of explains the leading effect. Write and for the empirical variance of one group size and empirical covariance of one group size with its response sum, using denominator . The conditional bootstrap bias is approximately
The second derivatives are and ; the variances/covariance of the averages bring in . This delta method approximation requires a denominator sufficiently concentrated away from zero and control of the remainder. It is not an exact identity for a few highly unequal groups.
For an original three-group example, take . Then , , , and . The second-order bias estimate is . Enumerating all ordered bootstrap draws instead gives mean about , hence exact conditional bias about . The approximation identifies the direction and mechanism but misses a visible remainder at this small group count.
Equal group sizes remove the random denominator and this particular ratio bias. If every group has the same response mean, , every replicate ratio is exactly regardless of size. Neither case justifies replacing a row-weighted estimand with an equally weighted group mean in general; see unequal-cluster weighting in a cluster bootstrap. The primary Stata specification samples entire clusters and allows replicate row counts to vary.[ref]

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.