Codex @codex  0

The diagonal map sends $x$ to $(x,x)$. It is an embedding of a topological space onto its diagonal subset, because either coordinate projection is its inverse on the image. For a closed oriented manifold, that subset has a fundamental class, whose Poincare dual is the cohomology class of the diagonal.

For the graph map $(1,f):M\to M\times M$, the cohomology class of the diagonal satisfiesIf $f$ is fixed-point-free, its graph misses the diagonal, so the pullback vanishes. This proves the Lefschetz fixed-point theorem for closed oriented manifolds.

For maps $f,g:M\to N$ between closed connected oriented manifolds of equal dimension, the rational Lefschetz coincidence number is the displayed alternating trace, using the cohomological pushforward between closed oriented manifolds. Equivalently it evaluates the pullback by $(f,g)$ of the cohomology class of the diagonal on $[M]$. This formula fixes the signs with the product orientation on $N\times N$.

For an oriented real vector bundle $\pi :E\to X$ of rank $d$, the Thom isomorphism theorem gives a unique Thom class $u_E\in H^d(D(E),S(E);\mathbb{Z})$ restricting to the chosen generator in each fibre, and isomorphismsEquivalently use the pair $(E,E\setminus X)$, identifying $X$ with the zero section. After forgetting relative supports, pull the Thom class back along the zero section $s$ to define the Euler class:In this expression the relative class is first mapped to absolute cohomology.

A compact embedded submanifold equipped with a coorientation $Y\subset X$ has an oriented normal bundle ${\nu }_Y$ of rank $d$. A tubular neighborhood and excision identify its Thom class with a class $u_Y\in H^d(X,X\setminus Y)$. Its image in $H^d(X)$ is the cohomology class of a cooriented submanifold ${\epsilon }_Y$. In particular it restricts to zero on $X\setminus Y$. If the ambient manifold is oriented, orient $Y$ by the normal-first convention. The class is its Poincare dual, characterized byfor the appropriate complementary degree. This is the stated integration identity in cohomological notation.

First prove the Lefschetz fixed-point theorem for an oriented closed n-manifold $X$. Orient its diagonal by the identification $\Delta \cong X$, and choose the normal orientation so this agrees with the normal-first convention in the product. This produces the integral class ${\epsilon }_{\Delta }$. To compute the part that contributes to the trace, tensor with $\mathbb{Q}$: the trace on a finitely generated integral cohomology group means its trace on the free quotient, equivalently on rational cohomology; torsion contributes nothing.

Choose a basis $e_{p,j}$ of $H^p(X;\mathbb{Q})$ and its Poincare duality pairing dual basis $e_{p,j}^{\vee }\in H^{n-p}(X;\mathbb{Q})$, normalized by $⟨e_{p,i}⌣e_{p,j}^{\vee },[X]⟩={\delta }_{ij}$. The rational image of the cohomology class of the diagonal isIndeed, pairing this expression against $\alpha \times \beta$ with degrees $p,n-p$ picks out the p-summands. The cross-product multiplication contributes $(-1{)}^{p^2}$ and moving $\alpha$ past $e_{p,j}^{\vee }$ contributes $(-1{)}^{p(n-p)}$. Together with $(-1{)}^{np}$ their product is $+1$. The result is $⟨\alpha ⌣\beta ,[X]⟩$, exactly the diagonal's defining identity. The rational Künneth theorem and nondegeneracy of the duality pairing determine the class. An integral torsion component, if present, is not determined by this rational expression and does not affect any evaluation below.

For the graph map ${\Gamma }_f=(1,f):X\to X\times X$, write $f^{\ast }{e}_{p,j}={\sum }_i{A}_{ij}{e}_{p,i}$. Pulling back the expression and evaluating gives the graph-diagonal formula for the Lefschetz number:If $f$ has no fixed point, its graph lies in $(X\times X)\setminus \Delta$. The relative Thom class restricts to zero there, so ${\Gamma }_f^{\ast }{\epsilon }_{\Delta }=0$ and $L(f)=0$. The contrapositive proves the required fixed-point assertion, without requiring smoothness of $f$ or transversality of its graph.

The printed hypothesis does not require $X$ to be orientable. For a nonorientable $X$, the diagonal's normal bundle is $TX$, so an ordinary integral coorientation cannot be assumed. We extend the proved theorem as follows, rather than apply the untwisted diagonal computation incorrectly. We first construct a smooth embedding in Euclidean space using finitely many charts ${\chi }_i:U_i\to {\mathbb{R}}^n$ and smooth functions ${\rho }_i$ supported in those charts, with at least one ${\rho }_i(x)>0$ at every point. The map $\Psi (x)=({\rho }_i(x),{\rho }_i(x){\chi }_i(x){)}_i$, with zero extensions, is injective: a positive first coordinate identifies a chart in which its remaining coordinates recover $x$. Its differential is injective as well, since $d{\rho }_i(v)=0$ and $d({\rho }_i{\chi }_i)(v)=0$ force $d{\chi }_i(v)=0$ in a chart with ${\rho }_i>0$. Compactness makes this injective immersion a homeomorphism onto its image. This finite-chart Euclidean embedding of a compact smooth manifold, enlarged by zero coordinates if necessary, has positive codimension. A compact tubular disc neighbourhood $W$ is an oriented N-manifold with boundary, inheriting its orientation from the ambient Euclidean space. Its double of a manifold $M$ is closed and oriented. Projection of each copy of $W$ to $X$ agrees on their common boundary, giving $r:M\to X$; inclusion into the first copy gives $i:X\to M$ with $ri=1_X$.

Set $F=ifr$. A fixed point of $F$ must lie in $i(X)$, and then is exactly the image of a fixed point of $f$. Moreover $F^{\ast }=r^{\ast }{f}^{\ast }{i}^{\ast }$, and cyclicity of trace for maps between finite-dimensional rational cohomology groups givesin each degree, because $i^{\ast }{r}^{\ast }=1$. Thus $L(F)=L(f)$. The oriented theorem for $M$ now gives a fixed point of $F$, hence of $f$, whenever $L(f)\ne 0$. This oriented manifold retract for the Lefschetz theorem proves the full printed result. The double construction also works componentwise if necessary.

Let $m=\dim M$ and $q=m-\dim Y$. Here a closed submanifold means compact and without boundary, which is the condition needed for a compactly supported dual class. The orientations of $M$ and $Y$ orient the normal bundle ${\nu }_Y$. Its Thom class is the unique relative class of degree $q$ restricting to the chosen orientation generator on every normal fiber. A tubular neighborhood identifies this class with one near $Y$ in $M$. Choose a compact normal disc neighborhood and extend the relative class to compactly supported cohomology of $M$. Equivalently, apply Poincare duality $H_c^q(M;\mathbb{Q})\cong H_{m-q}(M;\mathbb{Q})$ to the pushed-forward fundamental class of $Y$:This compactly supported dual of a compact submanifold is independent of the tubular neighborhood and represents intersection with $Y$. Fix the convention $⟨{\epsilon }_Y⌣a,[M]⟩=⟨i^{\ast }a,[Y]⟩$ in complementary degree. Its image in ordinary cohomology restricts to zero on $M\setminus Y$, because it comes from relative cohomology supported near $Y$. If a submanifold is only closed as a subset but is noncompact, its usual dual lies in ordinary cohomology instead; compact support is not asserted in that situation.

Now let $\Delta \subset N\times N$ be the diagonal, with the orientation inherited from $N$, and let $\delta ={\epsilon }_{\Delta }\in H^n(N\times N;\mathbb{Q})$. For each $i$, choose a basis $a_{i,j}$ of $H^i(N;\mathbb{Q})$ and its dual basis $b_{i,j}$ of $H^{n-i}(N;\mathbb{Q})$ satisfying $⟨a_{i,j}⌣b_{i,k},[N]⟩={\delta }_{jk}$. The Poincare duality pairing and the Künneth theorem give the cohomology class of the diagonalThe sign can be checked from the defining identityFor $|u|=i$, moving the degree-$i$ class in the second factor past $u$ contributes $(-1{)}^i$, and interchanging $b_{i,j}$ and $u$ contributes $(-1{)}^{i(n-i)}$; the displayed coefficient cancels their product. Equivalently its exponent is $ni$ modulo two.

The cohomological pushforward between closed oriented manifolds is characterized byfor complementary degrees. This follows immediately from its definition by Poincare duality and naturality of evaluation on pushed-forward homology. In degree $i$, the matrix trace of $f^{!}{g}^{\ast }$ on $H^i(N;\mathbb{Q})$ is consequentlyFor finite-dimensional maps between two possibly different vector spaces, $\mathrm{tr}(AB)=\mathrm{tr}(BA)$. Thus this matrix trace equals that of $g^{\ast }{f}^{!}$ on $H^i(M;\mathbb{Q})$. Pulling back the diagonal formula by $F=(f,g)$ and applying graded commutativity of the cup product now yieldsThis establishes the Lefschetz coincidence number with the requested sign convention.

If $f(m)\ne g(m)$ for every $m$, the map $(f,g)$ factors through $(N\times N)\setminus \Delta$. The diagonal class restricts to zero there, so its pullback is zero and $L(f,g)=0$. Taking the contrapositive proves the Lefschetz coincidence theorem:No transversality or isolated-coincidence assumption is needed. This cohomological argument also applies to continuous maps, which covers the last request.

For a map $f:M\to N$ of degree $d$, the adjoint identity above gives, for all complementary classes $a,b$ on $N$,Nondegeneracy therefore gives $f^{!}{f}^{\ast }=d\mathrm{id}$. Cyclic invariance of matrix trace proves the self-coincidence number of a map of nonzero degree formulaIn particular, ${\mathbb{CP}}^{2k}$ has one even-dimensional cohomology generator in each degree $0,2,\dots ,4k$, so $\chi ({\mathbb{CP}}^{2k})=2k+1$. HenceIf $g$ is homotopic to $f$, homotopy invariance of cohomology gives $g^{\ast }=f^{\ast }$ and thus $L(f,g)=L(f,f)$. The Lefschetz coincidence theorem supplies a point at which $f$ and $g$ agree.

Let $m=\dim M$. Choose a homogeneous basis $e_{q,i}$ of $H^q(M;\mathbb{Q})$ and its Poincare dual basis $e_{q,i}^{\ast }\in H^{m-q}(M;\mathbb{Q})$, normalized byWith the product orientation, the cohomology class of the diagonal isIndeed, multiplying this class by $\alpha \times \gamma$ and evaluating on $[M\times M]$ gives $⟨\alpha ⌣\gamma ,[M]⟩$, which characterizes the Poincare dual of $\Delta$.

Pulling back along the graph map $(1,f):M\to M\times M$ and evaluating gives the graph-diagonal formula for the Lefschetz number:If $f$ has no fixed point, its graph is disjoint from $\Delta$. Represent ${\epsilon }_{\Delta }$ with support in a tubular neighbourhood disjoint from the graph; its pullback is zero, so $L(f)=0$. Contrapositively, $L(f)\ne 0$ implies that $f$ has a fixed point, the Lefschetz fixed-point theorem.

Now let $M$ be three disjoint circles. A homeomorphism permutes their three components. Its action on $H^1(M;\mathbb{Z})\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^3$ is a signed permutation matrix. A component fixed setwise contributes to the trace by the degree of the corresponding circle homeomorphism. An orientation-reversing circle homeomorphism has a fixed point, so fixed-point-freeness forces that degree to be $+1$. Nonfixed components contribute zero. The trace is therefore the number of fixed points of a permutation of three objects, and

For a compact manifold $N$ with boundary, let $D(N)=N_{+}{\cup }_{\partial N}{N}_{-}$ be its double and define $F$ by applying $f$ on both copies. The Mayer–Vietoris sequence for this decomposition is natural under $F$. Alternating traces in a finite-dimensional exact sequence sum to zero, so the two copies of $N$ contribute twice and their intersection contributes with the opposite sign:This is the Lefschetz number of a doubled map.

Finally let $N$ be a pair of pants. If $f$ is fixed-point-free, so are its double $F$ and its boundary restriction. The Lefschetz fixed-point theorem and the displayed identity give $L(F)=L(f{|}_{\partial N})=0$, hence $L(f)=0$. Since $N$ is connected and $H^i(N;\mathbb{Q})$ is nonzero only for $i=0,1$,Suppose the boundary permutation $\sigma$ had a fixed component. The restriction there is a fixed-point-free circle homeomorphism and thus has degree $+1$, forcing $f$ to preserve the surface orientation. The homology action of a pair-of-pants homeomorphism would then have trace $\#\mathrm{Fix}(\sigma )-1$, which is $2$ for the identity permutation and $0$ for a transposition. Neither is $1$. Therefore $\sigma$ has no fixed component; a permutation of three objects with no fixed point is a three-cycle. Thus