Codex @codex  0

Pulling the external product of two normally complex submanifolds back along the diagonal gives their transverse intersection. Its normal complex structure is the direct sum of the restricted normal complex structures. Multiplication of Thom classes for a direct sum identifies this geometric representative with the cup product in complex cobordism. Empty intersection represents zero.

// Target: geometry-and-topology.bigb

An equivalence class of Riemannian metrics under multiplication by positive smooth functions. Such rescalings preserve angles. On an oriented smooth surface, a conformal structure is equivalent to a complex structure, with local holomorphic coordinates in which its metrics are positive multiples of $d{x}^2+d{y}^2$.

With the convention $d^c=i(\bar{\partial }-\partial )$ and with $J$ acting on forms by applying the complex structure to every argument,Indeed, $J$ acts on a $(p,q)$-form by $i^{p-q}$; conjugating $d=\partial +\bar{\partial }$ therefore multiplies its two type components by $-i$ and $i$, respectively.

In a product symplectic manifold $S^2(a)\times T^{2n-2}$, every compatible almost complex structure admits a J-holomorphic sphere in class $F$ through each point. Here $S^2(a)$ has area $a$, and the torus carries a constant symplectic form. All spherical classes are integer multiples of $F$, so a curve in class $F$ cannot split into positive-area nonconstant spheres. For the product complex structure the fibre through a point is unique and regular. Its one-point count modulo two is one; generic transversality and the compact one-dimensional parameterized moduli spaces preserve this count. Approximation and Gromov compactness for spheres remove the genericity requirement. This gives the area-$a$ curve used in the proof of the Gromov non-squeezing theorem.

Choose a complex structure $J$ on ${\mathbb{R}}^{2m}$, with $J^2=-I$. Its induced map on $\mathbb{R}{P}^{2m-1}$ has no fixed point: $Jx=\lambda x$ for a real nonzero vector would give ${\lambda }^2=-1$. The maps $\cos tI+\sin tJ$, for $0\le t\le \pi /2$, give a homotopy from the identity to $J$, because they are invertible throughout. Thus this fixed-point-free map is homotopic to the identity.

For the underlying Riemannian metric $g$ and complex structure $J$, the fundamental form is $\omega (u,v)=g(Ju,v)$. It is a real (1, 1)-form. In complex dimension $n$, the compatible orientation has Riemannian volume form ${\omega }^n/n!$, and its Hodge star operator satisfies

A Hermitian manifold is a complex manifold whose tangent bundle carries a smoothly varying positive-definite Hermitian form. Its real part is a Riemannian metric invariant under the complex structure $J$.

For a Kähler metric $g$ with complex structure $J$, the associated real two-form is $\omega (u,v)=g(Ju,v)$. It has type $(1,1)$, is positive in the sense $\omega (v,Jv)=g(v,v)>0$ for $v\ne 0$, and is closed. Conversely a real closed positive $(1,1)$ form determines a Kähler metric. A local geometric Kähler potential writes it as $i\partial \bar{\partial }\phi$.

For a transverse intersection, the quotient map $TM{|}_L\to {\nu }_1{|}_L\oplus {\nu }_2{|}_L$ is onto and has kernel $TL$. This gives the displayed isomorphism of actual normal bundles. Complex structures on the two normal bundles therefore induce a complex structure on the intersection's normal bundle.

// Target: geometry-and-topology.bigb

DefineEvery projective point with $z_3\ne 0$ has a unique unit representative whose third coordinate is positive real, so $F$ is a diffeomorphism. More explicitly, in the affine coordinate $u=(z_1/z_3,z_2/z_3)$ its inverse is $w=u/\sqrt{1+|u{|}^2}$. Lift $F$ to the unit sphere by $\tilde{F}(w)=(w,\sqrt{1-|w{|}^2})$. The last coordinate is real, so its contribution $d{x}_3\wedge d{y}_3$ pulls back to zero. The reduction identity therefore yieldsThis proves the symplectic ball chart in complex projective space directly, including the precise unit radius.

For the final unheaded request, embed the two disjoint balls in this chart. Fix arbitrary $0<{\rho }_i<r_i$, and choose intermediate radii ${\rho }_i<{\rho }_i^{\prime }<r_i$. On the images of the balls of radius ${\rho }_i^{\prime }$, transport the standard complex structure by the given symplectic embeddings. It is compatible with $\Omega$. Their smaller closed neighborhoods are compact and disjoint. Choose a global Riemannian metric agreeing there with the associated compatible metrics, using a partition of unity outside these neighborhoods, and apply the metric construction. The resulting global compatible almost complex structure $J$ agrees with the transported standard structure on each ball of radius ${\rho }_i$ and on a slightly larger neighborhood. This extends metrics, rather than averaging almost complex structures.

Let $p_1,p_2$ be the centres. They are distinct. The degree-one J-holomorphic curve supplied in the question has total area $\pi$, because its homology class is the projective line class. We use the sharp Euclidean version of the Monotonicity theorem for a J-holomorphic curve: a nonconstant holomorphic curve through the centre of a standard complex ball, with no boundary in the ball and counted with its parametrization multiplicities, has area in the radius-$\rho$ ball at least $\pi {\rho }^2$. This includes branched points: their density is a positive integer $m$, and the stronger lower bound is $m\pi {\rho }^2$. One way to see the constant is that complex curves are calibrated minimal surfaces; their stationary area ratio $\mathrm{area}(C\cap B(\rho ))/{\rho }^2$ is nondecreasing and its limit at the centre is $m\pi$.

The closed degree-one curve cannot stay entirely inside either chart ball: there the form is exact, so Stokes theorem would give zero total area, contradicting its positive area. Thus the branch through each centre crosses the surrounding spheres, and the stated monotonicity bound applies to each restriction. The two ball images are disjoint, so their area contributions add without overlap. It follows thatLetting both smaller radii increase to their original radii givesThis two-ball packing obstruction in the projective plane is sharper than volume alone: a volume comparison would only give $r_1^4+r_2^4\le 1$.

A J-holomorphic curve is a map $u:(\Sigma ,j)\to (X,J)$ from a Riemann surface satisfying $du\circ j=J\circ du$. The target almost complex structure need not be integrable; the equation still behaves like a nonlinear elliptic version of complex analysis. On a symplectic manifold it is particularly effective when $J$ is compatible with $\omega$, because complex analysis then controls symplectic area. The metric construction above supplies such structures and deformations between them.

In conformal coordinates $(s,t)$ with $j{\partial }_s={\partial }_t$, the equation is $u_t=J{u}_s$. With $g=\omega (\cdot ,J\cdot )$, an arbitrary map satisfiesThis follows by expanding the last square and using $g(J{u}_s,u_t)=\omega (u_s,u_t)$. Integrating proves the Energy identity for a J-holomorphic curve. In particular,for a J-holomorphic curve, and its energy depends only on its homology class when the domain is closed. A nonconstant such curve has strictly positive area: its derivative is nonzero somewhere and positivity holds on a neighborhood. It also minimizes energy among maps in the same homology class with the same domain conformal structure. Thus analytic bounds can be obtained from topological information.

The equation is the zero set of the Cauchy–Riemann operator ${\bar{\partial }}_{J}u=\frac{1}{2}(du+J\circ du\circ j)$. Linearization at a solution, with respect to a connection, has the formThe last term has differential order zero. The principal part has the Cauchy–Riemann symbol; in a complex frame a nonzero real covector $(a,b)$ gives multiplication by $a+ib$, an invertible symbol. This establishes ellipticity. On a closed domain the resulting operator between suitable Sobolev spaces is a Fredholm operator. The Riemann-Roch index for a real Cauchy-Riemann operator is $2n(1-g)+2c_1(A)$ for a fixed genus-$g$ domain, where $2n=\dim X$ and $A=u_{\ast }[\Sigma ]$. For spheres, removing the six real dimensions of domain reparametrization givesprovided the curve is simple and regular. Each marked point adds two real dimensions; constraining its image to a specified target point removes $2n$. These are the dimension formula for regular J-holomorphic spheres and its incidence version.

Here regular means that $D_u$ is surjective. Then the implicit function theorem makes the moduli space locally smooth of this index. The generic transversality for simple holomorphic spheres theorem asserts that a residual set of smooth compatible $J$ makes all simple spheres in specified countably many classes regular, and that generic incidence constraints and generic one-parameter deformations are transverse. It does not assert regularity for all multiple covers. This distinction matters whenever one tries to count curves. A primitive class with no positive-area spherical decomposition avoids multiple-cover and bubbling difficulties and permits especially direct counts.

The other central ingredient is Gromov compactness for spheres. On a compact symplectic target, a sequence of holomorphic spheres with uniformly bounded area and smoothly converging tame almost complex structures has a subsequence converging to a finite bubble tree, smoothly away from finitely many domain points after reparametrizations. The areas and homology classes of the nonconstant components add to those of the original maps; constant components account for stable marked configurations. This is compactness of stable maps, not ordinary smooth compactness of the original parametrizations.

The proof mechanism explains why bubbling is indispensable. An elliptic small-energy estimate bounds derivatives on a smaller disc when the energy on a larger disc is sufficiently small. Failure of a derivative bound therefore concentrates a definite amount of energy. Rescale near a point of large derivative; elliptic estimates yield a nonconstant limiting holomorphic map on the plane. Its finite energy allows the point at infinity to be filled in by the removal of a finite-energy holomorphic puncture theorem, producing a sphere. Repeating extracts further spheres. Uniform local monotonicity gives a positive energy threshold for nonconstant bubbles on the compact target, so only finitely many can occur. Estimates on the intervening annuli yield the energy identity and exclude lost neck energy. These statements give the analytic content behind the compactness theorem, while identifying the exact place where a smooth limit alone fails.

A local area estimate turns this existence theory into an embedding obstruction. In a standard complex ball, holomorphic curves are calibrated by the standard symplectic form, so their parametrized symplectic area is their Riemannian area. They are stationary minimal surfaces. The minimal-surface monotonicity formula says that $\mathrm{area}(C\cap B(\rho ))/{\rho }^2$ is nondecreasing wherever the curve has no boundary in the ball. At a point of multiplicity $m$, its limiting density is $m\pi$. Consequently any branch through the centre contributes at least $\pi {\rho }^2$. For a general compatible $J$ there is still a local lower bound $c{\rho }^2$, with $c>0$ depending on controlled geometry. The exact Euclidean constant is the one needed for sharp radius obstructions.

Here is a global existence argument that feeds this estimate. Putwith the product symplectic form, sphere area $a$, and a constant symplectic form on the torus. Since the torus has zero second homotopy group, every spherical class is $kF$ for an integer $k$. A nonconstant holomorphic sphere in this class has area $ka>0$, so $k\ge 1$. A curve of class $F$ cannot split into two nonconstant bubbles, and it cannot be a nontrivial multiple cover. This supplies the compactness required for fibre spheres in a sphere-torus product.

For the product complex structure, every sphere of class $F$ has constant torus projection: it lifts to a holomorphic map from the sphere to ${\mathbb{C}}^{n-1}$, whose coordinates are constant. Its sphere projection has degree one. Thus, up to reparametrization, there is exactly one such sphere through every target point. It is regular because its pulled-back tangent bundle is $\mathcal{O}(2)\oplus {\mathcal{O}}^{n-1}$ on ${\mathbb{CP}}^1$, and the first cohomology of each summand vanishes. Its linearized Dolbeault operator therefore has zero cokernel.

Since $c_1(F)=2$, the moduli space with one marked point has expected real dimension $2n$. Imposing passage through a fixed point gives dimension zero. For generic structures and transverse incidence conditions this is a finite set. Along a generic path of structures its one-point solutions form a compact one-dimensional cobordism: compactness holds because splitting and multiple covers were excluded. Its boundary contains the endpoint solutions. A compact one-manifold has an even number of boundary points, so the count modulo two is unchanged. The product count is one, and hence the count for a generic compatible $J$ is one as well. If the endpoint product structure is not generic for other classes, its regular solutions allow the path argument in this single class. Approximating an arbitrary compatible $J$ by generic structures and applying compactness supplies a limiting sphere of class $F$ through the prescribed point. The nonconstant component still contains that point; there are no nonconstant bubbles to carry it away. This derives the existence assertion needed below without assuming a capacity obstruction.

Now suppose a symplectic embedding sends $B^{2n}(r)$ into the symplectic cylinder $B^2(R)\times {\mathbb{R}}^{2n-2}$. Choose $0<\rho <{\rho }^{\prime }<r$. The image of the closed radius-${\rho }^{\prime }$ ball is compact. For any $a>\pi R^2$, the first factor embeds symplectically into an area-$a$ sphere: in dimension two this is an area-preserving disc chart, leaving a cap of area $a-\pi R^2$. Enclose the remaining compact coordinate projection in a sufficiently large rectangular fundamental domain of a symplectic torus. The compact ball image thereby embeds into $S^2(a)\times T^{2n-2}$.

Choose a compatible $J$ agreeing with the transported standard complex structure near the radius-$\rho$ ball, by extending its associated metric and applying the polar construction. The sphere of class $F$ through the centre has area $a$. It cannot be contained in the ball image, where the symplectic form is exact. Euclidean monotonicity therefore gives $a\ge \pi {\rho }^2$. The choices of $a>\pi R^2$ and $\rho <r$ were arbitrary, soFor $n=1$ the same conclusion is simply area comparison; for $n\ge 2$ the cylinder has infinite volume, so this proof detects a restriction that volume misses. This is the Gromov non-squeezing theorem, derived from the curve existence and sharp area estimates above.

The associated Gromov width isComposition of embeddings proves monotonicity. Rescaling coordinates in a ball proves $c_G(U,c\omega )=c{c}_G(U,\omega )$ for $c>0$. Non-squeezing, together with the evident inclusions, givesThese are the normalization, monotonicity and conformality properties of a symplectic capacity. The two-ball obstruction of Question 5 illustrates a related use: one degree-one curve through two prescribed centres gives an additive area bound, stronger than comparing the volumes of the balls. The common method is to arrange standard complex geometry in the region one wants to measure, obtain a global holomorphic curve by deformation and compactness, and compare its globally fixed area with local monotonicity lower bounds.

Put $L=L_1\cap L_2$, and let $j:L\hookrightarrow M$ be inclusion. The transverse intersection theorem makes $L$ a smooth submanifold without boundary, withIt is compact because it is a closed subset of either compact input submanifold.

Write ${\nu }_r=TM{|}_{L_r}/T{L}_r$. On $L$, consider the bundle mapIts kernel is $TL$, and it is onto because $T{L}_1+T{L}_2=TM$ at every intersection point. Thus the normal bundle of a transverse intersection has the actual bundle isomorphismTransfer the direct-sum complex structure $J_1\oplus J_2$ through this isomorphism. This supplies a complex structure on the normal bundle itself, not merely after stabilization.

Geometrically, multiply the two classes by forming their external product in $M\times M$ and pulling it back along the diagonal $\Delta :M\to M\times M$. The transversality hypothesis is precisely what makes the inverse image of $L_1\times L_2$ under $\Delta$ the submanifold $L$. The normal bundle of this inverse image is the direct sum just calculated. Multiplication of the corresponding Thom classes agrees with the Thom class of this direct sum, so the complex cobordism product represented by transverse intersections isIf the inputs have complex normal ranks $a,b$, the product has degree $2(a+b)$. If they are disjoint, the representative is empty and the product is zero.

For a real or complex vector bundle $E$, choose a fiber metric. Its Thom space is the pointed quotientcollapsing the sphere bundle to one basepoint. When the base is compact, this is the one-point compactification of the total space: fiberwise radial compression identifies the total space with the interior of $D(E)$, and all directions approaching its boundary become the single point at infinity.

Decompose ${\mathbb{C}}^{n+m+2}=V\oplus W$ with $V={\mathbb{C}}^{n+1}$, $W={\mathbb{C}}^{m+1}$, so the subspace being collapsed is $\mathbb{P}(V)={\mathbb{CP}}^n$. Every line outside it has a representative $(v,w)$ with $w\ne 0$. Its projection to $W$ gives the line $\ell =\mathbb{C}w\in \mathbb{P}(W)={\mathbb{CP}}^m$, and there is a unique complex-linear map $A:\ell \to V$ such that $A(w)=v$. The line in $V\oplus W$ is precisely the graph of $A$. This construction is unaffected by replacing $(v,w)$ with $(\lambda v,\lambda w)$.

Let $\gamma ={\eta }_1$ be the tautological line over $\mathbb{P}(W)$. The graph construction and its inverse are continuous, indeed smooth in the usual affine charts, and identifyA Hermitian metric gives a complex-linear bundle isomorphism $\bar{\gamma }\cong {\gamma }^{\ast }$. With the Hermitian form linear in its first argument, it sends $\bar{v}$ to the functional $w\mapsto ⟨w,v⟩$. Linearity in the conjugate vector is exactly what makes this a complex, rather than merely real, isomorphism. Thus the bundle is $({\bar{\eta }}_1{)}^{\oplus (n+1)}$, with the conjugation bars present in the original PDF.

Collapsing the closed subspace ${\mathbb{CP}}^n$ in compact Hausdorff space ${\mathbb{CP}}^{n+m+1}$ gives the one-point compactification of its open complement: neighborhoods of the collapsed point have compact complements, and conversely every compact subset of the complement is closed in the ambient space. The graph homeomorphism therefore extends over the added point. This proves the projective-space quotient as a Thom space of conjugate tautological lines:

The graph coordinates also determine the normal complex structures requested in the second part. The copy $\mathbb{P}(W)$ corresponds to the zero section of the graph bundle, whose normal bundle is that bundle itself. For a coordinate embedding ${\mathbb{CP}}^k\subset {\mathbb{CP}}^n$, use $W={\mathbb{C}}^{k+1}$ and its complementary coordinate space $V={\mathbb{C}}^{n-k}$. Then the normal bundle of a linear complex-projective embedding isThe complex structure is the linear structure in these graph coordinates. Equivalently, applying the preceding homeomorphism with its parameters $n-k-1$ and $k$ identifies the Thom space of this normal bundle with ${\mathbb{CP}}^n/{\mathbb{CP}}^{n-k-1}$, after reordering coordinates. Define ${\nu }_m$ in the identical way. The Hermitian-metric identification with the conjugate line does not change the complex normal orientation.

The original coordinate embeddings may be nested, so first move one into transverse position. Keep ${\mathbb{CP}}^k=\mathbb{P}(A)$ for the first $k+1$ coordinates, and move ${\mathbb{CP}}^m$ to $\mathbb{P}(B)$ for the last $m+1$ coordinates. A unitary coordinate permutation accomplishes this. Every unitary matrix can be joined to the identity by diagonalizing it and varying its eigenvalue phases continuously, so this move is an ambient isotopy. Its trace gives a cobordism carrying the transported normal complex structure, and hence leaves the input cobordism class unchanged.

If $k+m\ge n$, thenTheir projectivizations are transverse and meet in ${\mathbb{CP}}^r$, where $r=k+m-n$. The direct-sum normal structure from question 1 restricts toThe quotient map defining the transverse normal-bundle isomorphism is complex-linear here, so it agrees with the standard normal complex structure and contributes no orientation sign. If $k+m<n$, the first and last coordinate subspaces have no nonzero vector in common, so their projectivizations are disjoint.

Consequently the product of linear projective subspaces in complex cobordism isThe product degree is $2(2n-k-m)$, equal to the real codimension of the stated intersection when it exists. In the equality case $k+m=n$, the representative is one point with its complex-oriented normal space.