Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 60 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The physical spherical coordinates cover , , , and with periodic identification. The center and the polar axes are the usual coordinate singularities, rather than physical curvature singularities; a regular polar chart restricts and . For the null coordinates,Thus the physical metric tensor isThe conformal transformation followed by , gives , , andConsequently . Finally , converts to , yieldingThe ranges must retain their joint constraints:Equivalently, and , with . The angles retain their original ranges and identifications. Extending to negative values would double-count the radial polar geometry. The conformal factor isThe unphysical metric tensor extends onto the Einstein static universe, while physical Minkowski spacetime occupies the triangular region in its radial Penrose diagram. The edge is the regular center and belongs to the physical region away from its endpoints.
The conformal boundary consists of the following infinities. Future null infinity has , hence with , and corresponds to finite with . Past null infinity has , hence , and corresponds to finite with . Future timelike infinity is , past timelike infinity is , and spacelike infinity is . Although angles label points on null infinity, their two-spheres collapse at these three endpoint locations in the compactified picture.
The radial Minkowski conformal diagram and the endpoints of timelike, null and spacelike geodesics
. Details. For the geodesic endpoints in Minkowski conformal compactification, one can check the limits directly. A timelike inertial trajectory is with . At both and tend to , so and the trajectory ends at future timelike infinity. At both tend to , giving past timelike infinity. This includes a stationary inertial worldline with bounded .
For a null inertial trajectory, . As , , so has a finite limit while ; its future endpoint lies on future null infinity. As , , giving a finite limiting and , hence a past endpoint on past null infinity. Radial null geodesic paths have constant. A ray passing through the center changes its angular direction; in the angle-suppressed radial diagram it reflects at rather than terminating there.
A spacelike geodesic is also a straight line, now parametrized so that . At either end, asymptotically, , , and the endpoint is spacelike infinity. A radial spacelike line at has two opposite-angle halves which project onto the same horizontal interval in the diagram.
The conformal compactification endpoints occur at finite but at infinite physical proper time or affine parameter; Minkowski spacetime is geodesically complete. The conformal preservation of null geodesic paths does not preserve an affine parameter: if is physically affine, an unphysical affine parameter satisfies up to a constant. Along a complete null ray this can have a finite integral at infinity. Timelike and spacelike physical geodesic paths are not generally geodesics of the rescaled metric tensor, so their drawn curves must not be interpreted as freely falling unphysical observers.
Finally, every physical event can send an outgoing null ray to future null infinity, so is all of Minkowski spacetime. Its black-hole region and intrinsic event horizon are empty. The null edges in the diagram are infinity, not horizons concealing part of the physical manifold. Complete inertial observers likewise have no observer event horizon. Accelerated observers restricted to a Rindler wedge can have a Rindler horizon, but that is observer-dependent and does not contradict the horizon-free Minkowski spacetime. The conformal diagram compactifies infinity; it does not introduce a physical horizon.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 61 2 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The null momentum equation gives , with a constant null vector . Since the tangent is parallel to , every spatial direction ratio is constant:The changing potential changes the scale of the four-momentum, not its direction. Photon paths are therefore straight lines in the background Minkowski spacetime, up to reparametrization. This is also consistent with conformal preservation of null geodesic paths: the particle motion law can be expressed through a conformally flat metric, which cannot change the unparametrized null trajectories of the background.
Hence no: the theory predicts zero solar light deflection, in disagreement with the observed nonzero bending of light. For comparison, the leading Schwarzschild light deflection is at impact parameter . The scalar theory's nonzero gravitational redshift does not rescue this failed directional prediction.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 61 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The original spherical coordinates have , , and , with periodic. The angular coordinates degenerate at the polar axis and all angles identify at ; a regular spherical chart uses , and suitable overlapping angular patches.
The retarded time and advanced coordinate both range over , with the joint restriction . Their inverse relations are and , soSet , . ThenThe conformal factor is . Since , multiplication by givesFinally and give . HenceThis is a region of the Einstein static universe, with positive time and negative spatial signature. The exact joint coordinate domain isor equivalently and . The regular radial chart has ; is the ordinary centre. The angular ranges are unchanged. It is important not to treat the stated individual ranges of as independent. The inverse map and conformal factor provide a useful check:
The resulting Minkowski conformal compactification has a triangular radial Penrose diagram. The two sloping boundary edges areThese are future null infinity and past null infinity. The three vertices are future timelike infinity , past timelike infinity and spacelike infinity . They are ideal boundary points, not events of physical Minkowski spacetime.
For a complete inertial timelike geodesic, with . As , both and tend to , so and the curve ends at . As , both tend to , giving . These endpoints occur at infinite physical proper time.
For a complete null geodesic, write , . To the future, , so is finite and . Thus with finite: the endpoint lies on . To the past, remains finite while , giving . Physical affine parameter is infinite at both ends. Along a radial null path, , so the diagram represents its null directions at degrees.
For a complete spacelike geodesic, take , with . At either end asymptotically, so , and . Both ends therefore reach , again at infinite physical affine parameter. These are the geodesic endpoints in Minkowski conformal compactification.
Radial conformal compactification of Minkowski spacetime with images of complete timelike, null and spacelike geodesics
. Details. Only conformal preservation of null geodesic paths is guaranteed. The pictured timelike and spacelike curves are images of physical geodesics, not generally geodesics of the unphysical metric. For a null path, an unphysical affine parameter satisfies . Since near a generic null-infinity endpoint, the unphysical parameter can converge while the physical parameter diverges. At and , the usual smooth-boundary condition degenerates; these vertices should not be treated as regular points of null infinity.
Complete Minkowski spacetime has no black-hole event horizon. Every physical event can send an outgoing null signal to , so the black-hole region is empty. There is likewise no particle or future event horizon for an eternal inertial observer: any finite event can eventually signal that observer. Null infinity is a conformal boundary, not a physical horizon. Uniformly accelerated observers can have Rindler horizons, but that is an observer-dependent restriction and is not a horizon of the full inertial Minkowski spacetime.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 52 1 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
No: the theory predicts zero gravitational deflection of light. The reason is conformal preservation of null geodesic paths. Along a null geodesic with tangent , the geodesic equation for a conformally flat metric reduces tobecause . The acceleration is parallel to the tangent and changes only its parametrization. Equivalently, with , , so the unparametrized ray is a straight null geodesic of Minkowski spacetime. A positive conformal factor also preserves local angles, so this straight-path result cannot be hidden by changing the local angle measurement. It contradicts the nonzero solar deflection observed in gravitational lensing, while remaining compatible with the gravitational redshift in part (b).

