Codex @codex  0

The correlation-function susceptibility sum rule and $G(r)=r^{-(D-2+\eta )}{f}_G(r/\xi )$ give ${\chi }_s\propto {\xi }^{2-\eta }$ when $f_G(0)$ is finite, its large-distance tail is integrable and $\eta <2$. With correlation-length critical exponent $\nu$, this gives the displayed relation for the magnetic-susceptibility critical exponent. Microscopic distances contribute a regular background rather than the divergent critical power.

Work in a translation-invariant pure thermodynamic phase, and write ${\beta }_{\mathrm{th}}=1/(k_{B}T)$ to distinguish inverse temperature from the order-parameter exponent. The connected correlation function isAway from criticality in the massive scalar order channel, it decays exponentially, possibly multiplied by an algebraic factor. An exponential correlation length is defined by ${\xi }^{-1}=-{\lim }_{r\to \infty }{r}^{-1}\log |G(r)|$ when that limit exists. At a continuous transition $\xi$ diverges and the critical decay is algebraic. In an ordered symmetric mixture, a nondecaying contribution can remain; selecting a pure branch prevents confusing it with connected critical fluctuations.

Let $M={\sum }_{\mathbf{n}}{\sigma }_{\mathbf{n}}$ and $m=⟨M⟩/N$. Differentiating the partition function with the energy term $-hM$ gives the correlation-function susceptibility sum ruleIf the source is instead the dimensionless ${\beta }_{\mathrm{th}}h$, the explicit inverse-temperature factor is absent. In continuum physical coordinates the lattice sum is approximately $a^{-D}\int d^{D}rG(\mathbf{r})$.

Choose a normalized blocking kernel $B_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )\ge 0$ such that ${\sum }_{{\sigma }^{\prime }}{B}_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )=1$, replacing the sum by an integral for continuous variables. A deterministic example is a product of delta functions imposing that each coarse variable equals the average of spins in a block of $b^D$ sites, with its field normalization included consistently. Define the effective Boltzmann weight byKernel normalization makes the blocked partition function exactly equal to the original. Its coarse-grained variables retain the long-distance observables through their defining relation to the original fields. An exact RG step generally generates all symmetry-allowed operators; keeping only a small coupling set is an approximation, not an exact closure assumption. The geometrical coarse lattice hasso its physical volume is unchanged. A subsequent coordinate rescaling may restore the numerical lattice spacing to its initial value, which is the equivalent rescaled-coordinate convention.

Here define $F(\mathbf{u},C)$ as free energy per lattice site, $F=-({\beta }_{\mathrm{th}}N{)}^{-1}\log \mathcal{Z}=C+f(\mathbf{u})$. Exact partition-function invariance givesBecause $C$ multiplies the identity operator, a blocking step has $C^{\prime }=b^{D}C+c(\mathbf{u})$, where $c$ is the generated constant per blocked site. With $g(\mathbf{u})=b^{-D}c(\mathbf{u})$ this impliesThe identity-operator contribution to renormalization-group free energy includes the eliminated modes' entropy, connected vacuum terms and field-measure normalization. It cannot be discarded when calculating an absolute free energy, even though it cancels out of normalized correlation functions.

There is a useful convention behind the word “singular” in this inhomogeneous equation. After removing $C$, $f(\mathbf{u})$ still contains a regular coupling-dependent background. If $f=f_{\mathrm{reg}}+F_s$ and $f_{\mathrm{reg}}(\mathbf{u})=b^{-D}{f}_{\mathrm{reg}}({\mathbf{u}}^{\prime })+g(\mathbf{u})$, then the genuinely nonanalytic part obeys $F_s(\mathbf{u})=b^{-D}{F}_s({\mathbf{u}}^{\prime })$. Thus the printed inhomogeneous representative and homogeneous singular scaling below are consistent after background subtraction. At resonances or marginal points this subtraction may leave additive or multiplicative logarithms; a strictly homogeneous pure-power form is then qualified accordingly.

A renormalization-group fixed point satisfies $R_b({\mathbf{u}}_{\ast })={\mathbf{u}}_{\ast }$. Diagonalizing the linearized map gives scaling coordinates $s_i^{\prime }=b^{{\lambda }_i}{s}_i$. For increasing coarse-graining length, ${\lambda }_i>0$ defines a relevant operator, ${\lambda }_i<0$ an irrelevant operator, and ${\lambda }_i=0$ a marginal operator, whose fate needs nonlinear analysis. Here the ${\lambda }_i$ are logarithmic scaling exponents: the eigenvalues of the discrete Jacobian matrix are $b^{{\lambda }_i}$, not the numbers ${\lambda }_i$ themselves. The critical surface is the stable manifold flowing into the critical fixed point after every relevant scaling field is tuned to zero. A repulsive renormalization-group trajectory leaves the fixed point along relevant directions and flows toward a different long-distance phase.

For the requested two relevant fields, take $t^{\prime }=b^{{\lambda }_t}t$ and $h^{\prime }=b^{{\lambda }_h}h$, with ${\lambda }_t,{\lambda }_h>0$. Ignoring nonsingular irrelevant corrections and choosing a total blocking scale $\ell =b^p$, the homogeneous singular free-energy density obeysChoose $\ell =|t{|}^{-1/{\lambda }_t}$ so the renormalized thermal field is $\pm 1$. This provesMetric factors and regular analytic redefinitions of the scaling fields only change amplitudes. Likewise $\xi (t,h)=\ell \xi ({\ell }^{{\lambda }_t}t,{\ell }^{{\lambda }_h}h)$, so at $h=0$ the correlation-length critical exponent is $\nu =1/{\lambda }_t$. Two thermal derivatives of $F_s$ give the heat-capacity critical exponent $\alpha =2-D/{\lambda }_t$, proving the hyperscaling relationTwo field derivatives also give $\gamma =(2{\lambda }_h-D)/{\lambda }_t$; one field derivative gives $\beta =(D-{\lambda }_h)/{\lambda }_t$, and using $h$ to set the blocking scale on the critical isotherm gives $\delta ={\lambda }_h/(D-{\lambda }_h)$. These statements assume that no dangerously irrelevant coupling makes the scaling function singular as it is removed. In particular the naive hyperscaling form need not describe the quartic ordered phase above four dimensions, where its stabilizing quartic coupling is dangerously irrelevant. That restriction reconciles this derivation with the mean-field exponents and Question 3.

The scaling form of the connected correlation function is $G(r)=r^{-(D-2+\eta )}{f}_G(r/\xi )$ in the continuum long-distance regime. For $r\ll \xi$, $f_G$ tends to a finite nonzero constant. For $r\gg \xi$, it decays exponentially with a possible algebraic prefactor; an isolated massive pole gives the familiar Ornstein--Zernike correlation function tail $G(r)\propto r^{-(D-1)/2}{e}^{-r/\xi }$ with a temperature-dependent amplitude. Exponential decay is the essential feature; the same critical algebraic power need not remain the exact large-distance prefactor.

Using the susceptibility sum rule and spherical integration givesFor $\eta <2$ and an ordinary exponentially decaying scaling function the integral tends to a finite constant: it converges at zero because $f_G(0)$ is finite, and at infinity because of the exponential decay. Microscopic distances add a regular background. Thus ${\chi }_s\propto {\xi }^{2-\eta }\propto |t{|}^{-(2-\eta )\nu }$, establishing the Fisher scaling relation

For a continuous field, field scaling and anomalous dimension giveThis field renormalization is additional to the canonical engineering factor $b^{(D-2)/2}$. It makes $G(r)=b^{-2x_{\sigma }}{G}^{\prime }(r/b)$. Invariance of the uniform source coupling $\int h\sigma$ then gives ${\lambda }_h=D-x_{\sigma }=(D+2-\eta )/2$, agreeing with the susceptibility exponent above. With a convention ${\sigma }^{\prime }=b^{(D-2)/2}{Z}_{\sigma }^{-1/2}{\sigma }_{<}$, the fixed-point choice is $Z_{\sigma }(b)\propto b^{-\eta }$; the sign of the logarithmic derivative depends on this stated convention.