For a classical spin model with Hamiltonian , , define the static magnetic susceptibility per site by at fixed temperature. Differentiating its partition function gives
For a translation-invariant array of spins, write . Expanding the variance of the sum then yields . The derivative with respect to the dimensionless source removes the explicit inverse-temperature factor. Replacing the sum by an integral over physical coordinates requires the site-density factor .
The equal-time variance formula also holds in a quantum system when . Without that commutation assumption, differentiating a matrix exponential instead gives
This is an integrated imaginary-time-ordered correlation function, not generally times the equal-time variance. It follows by inserting
into the derivative of the normalized expectation value and using the cyclic matrix trace.
For example, a single qubit with , , has at , whereas . Their difference directly exhibits the quantum noncommutation correction. Below an ordered transition, selecting a pure thermodynamic phase also avoids a macroscopic phase-mixture contribution to the classical sum.
In a symmetric equal mixture of two ordered pure thermodynamic phases with magnetizations , the mean spin vanishes but the large-distance two-spin expectation tends to . Thus the connected correlation function of the mixture has a nondecaying part. The correlation-function susceptibility sum rule gives an extensive contribution to susceptibility per spin. This is phase-switching response, not the connected susceptibility within one pure phase. The latter uses the thermodynamic limit followed by a one-sided zero-field limit, and subtracts the nonzero pure-phase mean before defining the correlation length.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.