Consider a stipulated repeated-attempt model, with independent Bernoulli trials of success probability . An unsuccessful attempt costs three units of work, and a successful attempt costs one. Let be its success indicator function, its cost, and the first success. Observing reveals , so is a stopping time for the costs' natural filtration. The geometric distribution gives and , including the deterministic case . Thus
At , the average is four attempts and ten units of work. An independent check uses the pathwise identity : there are failures and one final success. No success probabilities or costs in this example are measured data.
Figure 1.
Cost and survival probabilities for stopping at the first success
. Original stipulated model with success probability , failure cost three, and success cost one. The top shows one illustrative stopped sequence; the lower panels show exact probabilities and the contributions to the expected value from each admitted step. Details.
Here is not independent of the observed costs. In particular, conditioning on forces every preceding cost to be three and the final cost to be one, so , generally different from at . Nevertheless the unconditional identity holds. This distinction explains why conditioning on the total count as though the original cost law remained unchanged is a faulty proof.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.