For a Lie bracket over or , antisymmetry of a Lie bracket means . In particular in these characteristic-zero fields. The Jacobi identity is
It expresses compatibility of the bracket with its own adjoint action. Bilinearity must hold over the chosen base field, and the bracket must take its values in the same vector space.
For the matrix commutator, bilinearity and antisymmetry follow directly from distributivity. Associativity of matrix multiplication gives
adding the two cyclic permutations cancels every monomial. Thus the Jacobi identity holds in the entire matrix algebra. For a specified linear subspace, the only additional bracket condition is closure: must belong to the subspace whenever do. It is unnecessary to require closure under the separate products and .
To determine the special unitary Lie algebra, let be a differentiable curve in the special unitary group with and . Differentiating gives . Differentiating at the identity gives . Conversely a traceless skew-Hermitian matrix has unitary and , so it really is a tangent vector. Therefore
This is a real Lie algebra of complex matrices: multiplication by generally leaves this real subspace. Its complexification is , not the compact algebra itself. For ,
Thus closure holds, and the already verified commutator identities establish all the Lie algebra axioms.
The cross-product Lie algebra on is bilinear, antisymmetric and closed because the cross product has those properties. Its Jacobi identity follows from the vector triple-product identity:
In the cyclic sum, the coefficients cancel by symmetry of the scalar product.
For the explicit relation to the SU(2) Lie algebra, take the three Pauli matrices and define
These matrices are traceless and Skew-Hermitian, and the three images of the standard basis form a real basis of . Using the Pauli matrix commutator identity,
Hence is a real Lie algebra isomorphism. The factor and sign are essential for preserving the unscaled cross-product bracket. At the group level there is an Adjoint double cover from SU(2) to SO(3); the isomorphism of their tangent algebras does not identify the two global groups.