Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 20 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
We prove the Mahler alternative in full. Let . Its series converges locally uniformly in the unit disc and satisfiesIt is transcendental as a function. At a root of unity with , the radial tail in is real and tends to infinity as , while the initial terms remain bounded. These roots are dense on the unit circle. An algebraic function can have singularities only at the finitely many zeros of its leading coefficient and polynomial discriminant: elsewhere its defining polynomial and the implicit-function theorem give local analytic branches. Hence cannot be algebraic over .
Assume now that and are algebraic, with , and put both in a number field of degree . For each , the coefficients of a polynomial of bidegree at most can cancel the first Taylor coefficients of . The equations have integer coefficients, so a nonzero integer solution exists after clearing denominators. Functional transcendence makes nonzero. Its order at zero satisfies .
At the functional equation gives . Thus is nonzero for all sufficiently large andUse the absolute logarithmic height . The elementary inequalities for sums and polynomial evaluation giveHere . The Liouville height inequality gives . Divide by and let to obtainThe left grows quadratically in , the right only linearly. Choose large to contradict this. Hence every such algebraic has transcendental . This is the auxiliary-value height argument for the Fredholm series.
For the rational continuation, let and . This is a rational number with reduced denominator , and its positive tail satisfies, for large ,A rational value would instead have distance at least from each distinct , already impossible. If the value were algebraic irrational, choose with . The distinct truncations have unbounded reduced denominators, and the displayed errors are eventually smaller than . This contradicts Roth theorem. Thus the requested rational values are transcendental by the Roth criterion for rational Fredholm values.
For completeness, the elliptic alternative's conclusion also has a short auxiliary-divisor certificate. If is Frobenius on , then and : the latter map is separable and its kernel is exactly the rational points. The divisor identity for on gives the parallelogram rule . Polarizing it yieldsAll these degrees are nonnegative. In particular , so . The Frobenius characteristic polynomial is ; its complex roots have modulus , including the double-root case. The zeta function has numerator , whose zeros consequently have modulus , the elliptic Riemann hypothesis. This supplements the fully proved Mahler branch with the degree-form proof of the Hasse bound; it is an auxiliary-divisor proof, not a claim that an unspecified transcendence theorem proves the bound.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 28 1 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The Hasse theorem for elliptic curves statesWe prove it by the positive degree of an isogeny. Let be the -power Frobenius isogeny, of degree . Its fixed points are precisely , so they form the kernel of . Since the differential of is zero, the differential of is the identity; thus is a separable isogeny. Its degree is the number of its geometric kernel points. ThereforeWe use the standard degree parallelogram law, together with : degree, extended by zero at the zero endomorphism, is a positive quadratic form on the endomorphism ring of an elliptic curve. Put , the Trace of Frobenius. Polarizing the degree form gives, for every pair of integers ,Indeed, the values on and are and , and the cross coefficient is fixed by . These are standard degree facts about isogenies of elliptic curves, which suffice without an assumption about characteristic or ordinariness.
For , division by shows at every rational . Density of the rational numbers and continuity of this polynomial make it nonnegative on the real line. Evaluating at its minimum gives , whence . Since , this proves the estimate. This is the degree-form proof of the Hasse bound; it proves both sides simultaneously by positivity of one degree form.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 125 1 a Solution 2026-10-03
The Hasse theorem for elliptic curves states that every elliptic curve satisfiesLet be the Frobenius isogeny and put . Its fixed points are exactly , so separability of givesThe degree of an isogeny is a nonnegative quadratic form on the endomorphism ring, and for all integers ,If , this quadratic polynomial has two real roots and takes a negative value at some rational between them, hence after clearing denominators at some integer pair . Therefore , and substituting proves the bound. This is the degree-form proof of the Hasse bound.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 iii Paper 125 2 Solution 2026-09-28
The degree of an isogeny is the degree of the induced finite extension of function fields. Saying that degree is a quadratic form on meansand thatis bilinear, equivalentlyThe trace of an elliptic-curve endomorphism isThe relation impliesthe trace of the square of an elliptic-curve endomorphism.
The Hasse theorem for elliptic curves states that for ,Let be the Frobenius isogeny of an elliptic curve, put , and note that andFor integers , quadraticity givesThis binary quadratic form cannot have positive discriminant, since rational numbers are dense, so . Substitution proves the bound. This is the degree-form proof of the Hasse bound.
Both endpoints occur. The curve over is supersingular with trace zero. Over , its Frobenius is , soIts nontrivial quadratic twist over has the opposite trace and therefore haspoints.