The mass-radius curve of solar-composition substellar objects reflects the transition from weak compression to pressure ionization and electron degeneracy pressure, followed by sustained hydrogen burning. A schematic joining representative object classes is:
The illustration is not an age-specific numerical evolutionary model. In particular, ice giants contain much more heavy material than a solar-composition giant, so a single uniform-composition equation of state does not describe the entire joined curve.
Planet/brown-dwarf naming conventions and deuterium burning do not define a universal discontinuity in the mass-radius relation. Composition, age and irradiation move the curves; the hydrogen-burning transition changes the long-term energy source more fundamentally.
A mass-radius curve of solar-composition substellar objects must specify age, irradiation and composition. For a mature, weakly irradiated hydrogen–helium sequence, the qualitative mass-radius relation has three main trends:
The conventional deuterium-burning mass near Jupiter masses marks a commonly used giant-planet/brown dwarf classification scale, not a sharp discontinuity in radius or a universal formation boundary. Young brown dwarfs are larger and cool by contraction; irradiation, a heavy-element core and hot-Jupiter radius inflation shift planets away from a single solar-composition curve.
The drawing is a qualitative mature sequence, not an interpolation of a specified evolutionary model grid. Three relevant observations, using representative historical measurements, are:
Gas-giant radius growth gives way to a nearly Jupiter-sized compressed branch, followed by rising radii in hydrogen-burning stars.