Linearizing the differential pom-pom model about its relaxed state leaves no first-order stretch perturbation in incompressible flow. Its anisotropic orientation obeys , producing the displayed relaxation modulus. In a slow-flow expansion, . Trace normalization and the first stretch correction affect only isotropic stress at this order, giving the displayed second-order fluid coefficients. Linear small-amplitude response allows arbitrary frequency, whereas this local second-order expansion also requires slow time dependence.
With its material state fixed by a prescribed deformation history, the differential pom-pom model is a simple-fluid constitutive law. The stress depends on the local history of a material element through its molecular stretch and orientation, without gradients of that history between neighbouring elements. A differential representation does not prevent a material from being a simple fluid.
To see the history dependence explicitly, use the component-first velocity gradient , so the tensor evolution is . Let be the relative deformation gradient, satisfying and . Along a material trajectory, an integrating factor gives
Thus is a functional of the local deformation history and its prepared initial state. If the initial is a positive-definite matrix, it retains that property, so is well defined. Given this , the scalar stretch solves , where . Its variation of constants formula again depends only on that local history:
The differential pom-pom model also satisfies material frame indifference. Under an observer rotation, and transform as objective tensors, while is a scalar. The extra skew part of the transformed velocity gradient has zero contraction with symmetric , so the stretch equation is unchanged. The tensor evolution uses an upper-convected derivative, and the final stress transforms objectively. Initial values cannot be independently forgotten when specifying a finite-past experiment: a fully specified prepared state, such as rest, is part of the history specification.
Choose the extending direction as and write . The uniaxial extensional flow, satisfying incompressibility, has
Starting from rest, symmetry preserves . The differential pom-pom model tensor equation becomes
Put . For , the solutions are
If , both transients decay, giving
If , the axial component is instead and grows exponentially without bound, while . At the boundary , which lies between the two stated regimes, grows linearly and .
Normalization makes the molecular orientation finite even when the unnormalized conformation tensor diverges. For , direct division by gives
For , the divergent axial component dominates the matrix trace, so
The same normalized limit holds at , agreeing continuously with the limit of the subcritical expression. The limiting orientations have nonnegative eigenvalues and unit matrix trace, as required for the normalized molecular orientation.
Now set . Its limiting value is
The scalar stretch equation is . If , its coefficient is eventually bounded above by a negative constant. The variation of constants formula gives a bounded solution, converging to
If , the coefficient is eventually positive, and the positive stretch grows without bound. At equality a bounded stretch would imply , which contradicts boundedness. Thus equality is not an additional bounded steady regime.
The function is continuous and strictly increasing from zero to infinity. Consequently there is a unique critical extension rate defined by
and the molecular stretch remains bounded precisely for . This is distinct from the tensor threshold . If , for example, the normalized orientation can remain well defined and the stretch remain bounded for some rates above the tensor threshold; divergence of alone does not prove divergence of the physical stress.
In the requested doubly subcritical regime, write . The steady uniaxial extension of the differential pom-pom model has
The isotropic pressure cancels from the tensile normal-stress difference. Hence the extensional viscosity is
or
Its zero-rate limit is , recovering the Trouton ratio of three. The restrictions exclude both loss of a finite tensor steady state and loss of a finite stretch steady state; neither denominator may be continued through its singularity as a physical steady constitutive response.