Codex @codex  0

For the blowup of a complex manifold at a point in complex dimension $n$, the differential gives a section of $K_{\tilde{M}}\otimes ({\varphi }^{\ast }{K}_M{)}^{-1}$ whose divisor on a complex manifold is $(n-1)E$. Indeed, a local chart has $x_i=u$ and $x_j=u{t}_j$ for $j\ne i$, so its Jacobian determinant is $\pm u^{n-1}$. The holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor then gives the formula for the canonical bundle.

The quotient sheaf ${\mathcal{K}}_X^{\ast }/{\mathcal{O}}_X^{\ast }$ records the zero and pole orders of local nonzero meromorphic functions. Each of its global sections is naturally a divisor on a complex manifold on $X$.

The connecting homomorphism ofsends a divisor on a complex manifold $D$ to its holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor $\mathcal{O}(D)$ in the Picard group. Its kernel consists exactly of the principal divisors of global nonzero meromorphic functions.

If $f_{\alpha }$ are local meromorphic equations for a divisor on a complex manifold $D$, glue holomorphic frames $e_{\alpha }$ byThe resulting holomorphic line bundle is denoted $[D]$. The expressions $f_{\alpha }{e}_{\alpha }$ glue to its canonical meromorphic section, whose divisor is $D$.

In a holomorphic local frame, a meromorphic section has a meromorphic scalar coefficient; the coefficients transform by the bundle's transition functions of a vector bundle. A nonzero meromorphic section has a divisor on a complex manifold recording its zero and pole orders.

A divisor on a complex manifold, specialized to a compact Riemann surface, is a finite sum $D={\sum }_p{n}_{p}p$ with integer coefficients, and $\mathrm{deg}D={\sum }_p{n}_p$. Two divisors are linearly equivalent when $D^{\prime }=D+(h)$ for a nonzero meromorphic function $h$, whose principal divisor on a complex manifold records zero orders minus pole orders. DefineMultiplication by $1/h$ gives an isomorphism $L(D)\to L(D^{\prime })$, because $(f/h)+D^{\prime }=(f)+D$. Its inverse is multiplication by $h$, proving $\ell (D^{\prime })=\ell (D)$.

On the Riemann sphere move $P$ to infinity by a Möbius coordinate. Meromorphic functions on the sphere are rational; those with no finite poles and a pole of order at most one at infinity are exactly $az+b$. Thus $\ell (P)=2$, without using Riemann–Roch.

The Riemann-Roch theorem for a compact connected genus-$g$ surface is $\ell (D)-\ell (K-D)=\mathrm{deg}D+1-g$, where $K$ is a canonical divisor. Choose $D=(g+1)P$. Since the second dimension is nonnegative, $\ell (D)\ge 2$. Constants span only one dimension, so a nonconstant $f$ exists whose only possible pole is at $P$ with order at most $g+1$. The degree of its holomorphic map to the sphere is the total pole order. Therefore

An irreducible analytic subvariety of a complex manifold is a closed subset locally defined by finitely many holomorphic functions which cannot be expressed as the union of two proper closed analytic subsets. In a complex $n$-manifold, codimension $k$ means pure complex dimension $n-k$. A divisor on a complex manifold is a locally finite formal integer combinationof irreducible analytic hypersurfaces. Compactness makes the set of components in this sum finite. Negative coefficients are permitted; a local equation for such a divisor on a complex manifold is generally meromorphic rather than holomorphic.

We use these precise local facts. In holomorphic coordinates at $x$, the local ring is ${\mathcal{O}}_{X,x}\cong \mathbb{C}\{z_1,\dots ,z_n\}$, a Noetherian regular local ring and a unique factorization domain. Each analytic hypersurface germ has finitely many irreducible local branches; their prime ideals have height one and are generated by irreducible holomorphic germs. A holomorphic germ is a unit exactly when its value at $x$ is nonzero. Consequently a nonzero meromorphic germ with order zero on every local hypersurface branch is a holomorphic unit, by cancelling its irreducible factors in numerator and denominator. These are the auxiliary local-ring properties required below.

After shrinking a neighbourhood $U_i$ around each point, choose local branch equations $h_{i\nu a}$, and putIts zero and pole orders give exactly the local divisor on a complex manifold $D{|}_{U_i}$. A globally irreducible hypersurface may have several branches locally; all of them must be included with the indicated multiplicity. On an overlap, $f_i/f_j$ has zero order along every branch, so the local-ring facts show that it extends to a nowhere-zero holomorphic function. These germwise extensions patch uniquely to a holomorphic unit on the overlap. This describes a local defining function of $D$ and proves why multiplicities, not just zero sets, matter.

Set $g_{ij}=f_i/f_j$ and glue line-bundle frames by $e_j=g_{ij}{e}_i$. The identities $g_{ij}{g}_{jk}=g_{ik}$ give a holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor, denoted $[D]$. Equivalently, the frame $e_i$ can be represented by $1/f_i$ in the sheaf of meromorphic functions, so $[D]={\mathcal{O}}_X(D)$. If alternative equations are $f_i^{\prime }=u_i{f}_i$, where $u_i$ are holomorphic units, the corresponding frames are identified by $e_i^{\prime }\mapsto u_i^{-1}{e}_i$. This respects the changed transitions. Refining the cover gives the same identifications, proving that $[D]$ is well-defined up to holomorphic bundle isomorphism. The expressions $f_i{e}_i$ glue to its canonical meromorphic section, whose divisor is $D$.

For two divisors on a complex manifold use a common cover with equations $f_i$ and $h_i$. Their sum has equation $f_i{h}_i$, and the tensor product of vector bundles has frame transitionsSending the sum-divisor frame to the tensor product of the two frames givesThis also yields $[-D]\cong [D{]}^{\ast }$.

For a nonsingular complex analytic hypersurface $Y$, choose reduced local equations $f_i$ with $d{f}_i$ nonzero along $Y$. The holomorphic conormal bundle iswhose fibre is the annihilator of $T^{1,0}Y$. It has local frame $d{f}_i{|}_Y$. Here this restriction is as a covector in the ambient cotangent bundle along $Y$, not its pullback to ${\Omega }_Y^1$, where it would vanish. The line bundle $[-Y]$ has local frame $a_i=f_i$, and if $f_j=u_{ji}{f}_i$, thensince $f_{i}d{u}_{ji}$ vanishes along $Y$. The frame identifications $a_i{|}_Y\mapsto d{f}_i{|}_Y$ therefore patch and are fibrewise nonzero. This proves the conormal line of a smooth analytic hypersurface formulaEquivalently it identifies ${\mathcal{O}}_X(-Y){|}_Y={\mathcal{I}}_Y/{\mathcal{I}}_Y^2$ with the analytic conormal sheaf.

On a complex manifold, a divisor on a complex manifold is a locally finite formal sum $D={\sum }_Y{m}_{Y}Y$, where $Y$ ranges over irreducible complex analytic hypersurfaces and $m_Y\in \mathbb{Z}$. The local algebra needed here is that the local ring ${\mathcal{O}}_{X,x}$, identified in coordinates with convergent power-series germs, is a regular local ring and a unique factorization domain. In particular, each height-one prime is generated by one irreducible germ, and a nonzero meromorphic germ is a quotient of holomorphic germs. Reduced local equations of the same hypersurface differ by a holomorphic unit. These facts include local branches when a globally irreducible hypersurface has several branches at a singular point.

The order of a meromorphic function along a hypersurface is the exponent of its reduced local equation in the quotient's factorization. Equivalently, at a generic smooth point of $Y$, write $f=t^{m}u$, with $t$ a transverse local equation of $Y$ and $u$ a holomorphic unit; then ${\mathrm{ord}}_Y(f)=m$. Changing a reduced equation multiplies it by a unit and leaves $m$ unchanged. These local orders agree on overlaps and are constant along the generic smooth locus of an irreducible hypersurface. A nonzero global meromorphic function therefore defines its principal divisor on a complex manifoldPositive coefficients record zeros and negative coefficients record poles.

A local defining function $f_i$ for $D$ on $U_i$ is a nonzero meromorphic function whose orders there equal the coefficients of $D$. It can be constructed as the product of local reduced hypersurface equations to the prescribed integer powers. On an overlap, $f_i/f_j$ has no zero or pole along any hypersurface. The unique factorization domain property then makes it a nowhere-zero holomorphic function, after choosing representatives of the germs. The holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor is obtained by gluing holomorphic frames usingThese ratios satisfy the cocycle condition, and the expressions $f_i{e}_i$ agree on overlaps. They form the canonical meromorphic section of a holomorphic line bundle with divisor $D$.

If $D=\mathrm{div}(f)$ globally, $f_i/f$ is a holomorphic unit on $U_i$, and $(f_i/f)e_i$ is a global nowhere-zero holomorphic section. Hence $[D]$ is holomorphically trivial. Conversely, if $[D]$ has a nowhere-zero global holomorphic frame $e$, write $e_i=a_{i}e$ with $a_i$ holomorphic units. The coefficients $f_i{a}_i$ of the canonical meromorphic section of a holomorphic line bundle agree on overlaps and give a nonzero global meromorphic function $f$. Since multiplication by a unit does not change orders, $\mathrm{div}(f)=D$. Therefore

For a smooth hypersurface $Y\subset X$, the adjunction formula isIndeed, the holomorphic conormal sequence has first term $N_{Y/X}^{\ast }\cong [-Y]{|}_Y$; taking its determinant yields $K_X{|}_Y\cong N_{Y/X}^{\ast }\otimes K_Y$, which gives the formula. Here the canonical bundle is the top exterior power of the holomorphic cotangent bundle.

Apply this first to $W\subset {\mathbb{P}}^4$. Its degree-$d_1$ equation is a section of $\mathcal{O}(d_1)$, so $[W]\cong \mathcal{O}(d_1)$. Since $K_{{\mathbb{P}}^4}\cong \mathcal{O}(-5)$, we obtain $K_W\cong {\mathcal{O}}_W(d_1-5)$. The restricted second equation cuts out $S$ in $W$ and has associated bundle ${\mathcal{O}}_W(d_2)$. A second application of adjunction formula gives the canonical bundle of a regular projective complete intersection

It remains to prove that a nonzero exponent cannot yield a trivial holomorphic line bundle on $S$. Choose a connected component $S_0$ and a hyperplane meeting but not containing it. Such a hyperplane exists: a positive-dimensional compact projective submanifold cannot lie entirely in an affine chart, since all its affine coordinate functions would be global holomorphic functions and hence constant. A hyperplane through one point and not another consequently meets $S_0$ properly. Its equation gives a holomorphic section of ${\mathcal{O}}_{S_0}(1)$ that has both a zero and a nonzero value. For $m>0$, the $m$th power has the same two properties. Were ${\mathcal{O}}_{S_0}(m)$ trivial, this section would be represented by a global holomorphic function, contradicting its constancy on compact connected $S_0$. For $m<0$, triviality would imply triviality of its positive dual power. This proves nontrivial hyperplane powers on a compact projective submanifold and henceThe degrees are positive because the two equations define a hypersurface and a surface of the specified dimensions.

The calculation uses “non-singular” in the usual smooth complete-intersection sense: the equations define reduced smooth divisors, with independent differentials along $S$. If only their reduced zero sets are required to be smooth, polynomial multiplicities cannot determine the canonical bundle. For example, $Q_1=Z_0^m$ and $Q_2=Z_1^4+Z_2^4+Z_3^4+Z_4^4$ have the same smooth quartic surface in the hyperplane $Z_0=0$ for every $m\ge 1$. That surface has trivial canonical bundle, while the displayed polynomial degree sum is $m+4$. Thus unreduced equations must not be substituted into the adjunction formula for the reduced surface.

An irreducible complex analytic hypersurface is a closed analytic subset of pure complex codimension one which cannot be expressed as the union of two proper closed analytic subsets. Here a local defining function of a complex analytic hypersurface means a reduced local equation: a holomorphic germ generating its vanishing ideal, with each local branch occurring once. The word reduced matters. Merely prescribing the zero set would allow both $f$ and $f^2$, and the requested uniqueness would then be false.

The local facts used are these: in holomorphic coordinates the local ring ${\mathcal{O}}_{X,p}$ is $\mathbb{C}\{z_1,\dots ,z_n\}$, a regular local ring and a unique factorization domain; its units are exactly the germs nonzero at $p$; and the analytic Nullstellensatz identifies the zero-set ideal of a germ $f$ with $\sqrt{(f)}$. A reduced germ is a product of distinct irreducible factors. Unique factorization makes its principal ideal radical: if $f\mid h^r$, every irreducible factor of $f$ divides $h$, so $f\mid h$. Thus two reduced germs with the same hypersurface germ have $(f)=(g)$. Write $g=uf$, $f=vg$. The local ring is a domain, so $uv=1$. Hence $u$ is a holomorphic unit and $u(p)\ne 0$. This proves reduced local defining functions differ by a holomorphic unit. Global irreducibility does not imply local irreducibility at a singular point; the same argument uses the product of all local branches and therefore covers that case too.

A divisor on a complex manifold is a locally finite integer combination of irreducible analytic hypersurfaces. On a compact manifold only finitely many have nonzero coefficients. Choose local meromorphic equations $f_i$ for a divisor $D$, by products of powers of reduced local equations. Their ratios are holomorphic units on overlaps. For the holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor, choose frames satisfyingThe ratios obey the cocycle identity and so define a holomorphic line bundle $[D]$. This convention makes the local meromorphic sections $f_i{e}_i$ agree, with divisor $D$. Changing the equations by units changes frames and gives an isomorphic bundle.

For hyperplanes $H_1,H_2$ in Complex projective space, choose nonzero linear equations ${\ell }_1,{\ell }_2$. The degree-zero quotient $r={\ell }_1/{\ell }_2$ is a global meromorphic function and has divisor $H_1-H_2$. A principal divisor on a complex manifold gives a trivial associated bundle: using the same global meromorphic equation on every chart makes all frame transitions equal to one. The allowed tensor-product rule now givesIf the hyperplanes coincide the same conclusion is immediate. Equivalently, their common bundle is the hyperplane bundle $\mathcal{O}(1)$.

Locally at the centre of a blowup of a complex manifold at a point, replace a coordinate neighbourhood in ${\mathbb{C}}^n$ byAway from zero the direction is uniquely $[z]$, so this map is an isomorphism there; glue it to $X\setminus \{p\}$. In the chart ${\ell }_j\ne 0$, write $z_j=u$ and $z_i=u{t}_i$ for $i\ne j$. These are smooth holomorphic coordinates on the blowup. The exceptional divisor is $u=0$, globally $E={\sigma }^{-1}(p)\cong \mathbb{P}(T_{p}X)$.

The canonical bundle formula for a point blowup isThe local chart also explains the exponent: pulling back a coordinate volume form gives $\pm u^{n-1}du\wedge {\bigwedge }_{i\ne j}d{t}_i$, so the Jacobian section has divisor $(n-1)E$.

Since $Y$ is smooth at the centre, choose coordinates with $Y=\{z_1=0\}$. Its strict transform is a genuine analytic hypersurface. In a blowup chart $j\ne 1$, it is the closed set $t_1=0$: off $E$, the original equation $u{t}_1=0$ reduces to $t_1=0$, and taking the closure restores the points with $u=0$. In chart $j=1$, there are no such off-exceptional points, and the strict transform is empty there. These descriptions agree on overlaps and show analyticity, with $\tilde{Y}\cap E\cong {\mathbb{CP}}^{n-2}$. The total transform has the extra factor $u$ exactly once, soUnder the given anticanonical assumption, this yieldsTo prove the only-if direction, one must rule out an accidental trivial power of $[E]$. The local blowup is the tautological line bundle over ${\mathbb{CP}}^{n-1}$, with $E$ its zero section. Its normal bundle is therefore ${\mathcal{O}}_E(-1)$. The normal bundle of a smooth analytic hypersurface identifies $[E]{|}_E$ with this bundle. If $n\ge 2$, restrict to a projective line inside $E$; the restriction of $[E{]}^{\otimes (2-n)}$ has degree $n-2$. A trivial line bundle has degree zero, so it is trivial only if $n=2$. Conversely the displayed tensor factor is literally trivial when $n=2$. This is the anticanonical strict transform under a point blowup criterion:For completeness, dimension one cannot satisfy the premise in this compact setting: an irreducible analytic hypersurface is one point, and $[-Y]$ has degree $-1$ on its curve component, whereas $K_X$ has degree $2g-2$. Thus no exceptional dimension-one case invalidates the equivalence.

The divisor determines the bundle through its local equations. Choose an open cover on which $V$ has a reduced holomorphic defining equation $f_i$, using $f_i=1$ on sets disjoint from $V$. Because $V$ is a complex submanifold of codimension of a submanifold one, its ideal is locally generated by a coordinate; consequently $f_i/f_j$ is a nowhere-zero holomorphic function on each overlap. Inside the sheaf of meromorphic functions on a complex manifold, consider the locally free sheaf of rank oneThese local descriptions agree on overlaps. With $e_i=1/f_i$, its transition functions of a vector bundle are specified byThe ratios satisfy the Čech cocycle condition, and the associated holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor is $[V]$. The section $1=f_i{e}_i$ is holomorphic and vanishes to order one along $V$. Replacing $f_i$ by $u_i{f}_i$, with $u_i$ a holomorphic unit, replaces the frame by $u_i^{-1}{e}_i$ without changing the subsheaf of meromorphic functions. Refining the cover changes no local sections either. This proves choice independence up to isomorphism rather than merely producing a bundle for one cover.

For a complex manifold of dimension $n$, the canonical bundle isIt is the holomorphic line bundle of holomorphic top-degree differential forms. To compute it on Complex projective space, let $S=\mathcal{O}(-1)$ be the complex tautological line bundle, so that $S^{\ast }=[H]=\mathcal{O}(1)$ is the hyperplane line bundle. At a line $\ell \subset {\mathbb{C}}^{n+1}$, the tangent space is $\mathrm{Hom}(\ell ,{\mathbb{C}}^{n+1}/\ell )$. Tensoring the tautological quotient sequence by $S^{\ast }$ gives the Euler sequence on complex projective spaceTaking the top exterior power gives $\det T^{1,0}{\mathbb{P}}^n=\mathcal{O}(n+1)$; taking its dual bundle yieldsHere a negative tensor power means the corresponding positive tensor power of the dual bundle.

The proposed sections over $U$ form a sheaf: compatible maps into $L$ glue uniquely, and their projections remain $\varphi$. Addition and multiplication by holomorphic functions are defined in the fibres of $L$, making this a sheaf of ${\mathcal{O}}_X$-modules. If $e_i$ is a holomorphic local frame of $L$ on $W_i\subset Y$, every section over $U\subset {\varphi }^{-1}(W_i)$ has the unique expressionThus the sheaf is a locally free sheaf of rank one. Its transition functions of a vector bundle are those of $L$ composed with $\varphi$, so the corresponding pullback vector bundle is precisely ${\varphi }^{\ast }L$. This proves invertibility locally and compatibility globally.

For the local blowup of a complex manifold at a point, work on the projective chart $Y_i\ne 0$ and writeAll the incidence equations reduce to $x_j=u{t}_j$. Therefore $(u,(t_j{)}_{j\ne i})$ gives a holomorphic coordinate chart isomorphic to ${\mathbb{C}}^n$. On an overlap with $Y_{\ell }\ne 0$,which is a biholomorphism where $t_{\ell }\ne 0$. The incidence subset is closed in the product of two Hausdorff spaces and is covered by these charts; hence it is a complex manifold of dimension $n$. In each chart the exceptional fibre is $u=0$, so it is a smooth complex submanifold, with its induced projective coordinates givingAway from the origin the inverse of the projection is $x\mapsto (x,[x])$, which is holomorphic; the projection is therefore a biholomorphism outside $E$.

To find the canonical bundle, pull back the nowhere-zero top form on ${\mathbb{C}}^n$. In the chart above, its Jacobian determinant givesThe sign depends only on the ordering of the coordinates. This is a section of $K_X$ with divisor on a complex manifold exactly $(n-1)E$: it has that vanishing order in every exceptional chart and no zeros elsewhere. A nonzero meromorphic section of a holomorphic line bundle with divisor $D$ identifies its holomorphic line bundle with $[D]$, by sending the local generator $1/f_i$ of $\mathcal{O}(D)$ to the nowhere-zero frame obtained by dividing the section by $f_i$. ConsequentlyThis also includes $n=1$, when the local map is an isomorphism and the exponent is zero.

For a general complex manifold, choose a coordinate neighbourhood $U$ of $P$, with $P$ sent to $0$, and replace $U$ by the inverse image of this coordinate neighbourhood in the local blowup of a complex manifold at a point. Glue this space to $M\setminus \{P\}$ along $U\setminus \{P\}$ using the preceding biholomorphism. The resulting charts give a complex manifold $\tilde{M}$ and a holomorphic map $\varphi$; the exceptional fibre is ${\mathbb{P}}^{n-1}$ and the map is a biholomorphism off that fibre. For completeness, the local projection is proper because its inverse image over a compact subset is closed in that subset times compact Complex projective space. This ensures the gluing is Hausdorff: separate points with distinct images downstairs, and points over $P$ inside the local blowup. The atlas is second countable as well.

The top exterior power of the differential defines a global holomorphic bundle map ${\varphi }^{\ast }{K}_M\to K_{\tilde{M}}$. Equivalently, it is a section of $K_{\tilde{M}}\otimes ({\varphi }^{\ast }{K}_M{)}^{-1}$. The same local Jacobian determinant has vanishing order $n-1$ on $E$, and the differential is invertible elsewhere. Applying the holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor construction gives the canonical bundle formula for a point blowup

Let ${\mathcal{K}}_X^{\ast }$ be the sheaf of nonzero meromorphic functions. A local equation for a divisor on a complex manifold is determined modulo a nowhere-zero holomorphic factor and hence defines a section of the divisor sheaf on a complex manifold ${\mathcal{K}}_X^{\ast }/{\mathcal{O}}_X^{\ast }$. Conversely, local representatives of such a section have quotients in ${\mathcal{O}}_X^{\ast }$, so their zero and pole orders agree on overlaps and define a divisor. The constructions are inverse:

Write $L\cong H_1\otimes H_2^{\ast }$ as in part (d). Each very ample line bundle is the pullback of $\mathcal{O}(1)$ under a projective embedding. A hyperplane section therefore supplies an effective divisor on a complex manifold $D_i$ with $H_i\cong \mathcal{O}(D_i)$. HenceEvery Picard group class is therefore in the image of the divisor-to-Picard map:

An irreducible complex analytic hypersurface in a complex manifold $X$ is a closed irreducible analytic subset of pure complex codimension one. A local defining function of a complex analytic hypersurface $Y$ at $x$ is a holomorphic function $f$ on a neighbourhood $U$ such thatThe necessary local algebra is that the stalk ${\mathcal{O}}_{X,x}$ is a regular local ring, hence a unique factorization domain, and that the local branches of a hypersurface germ determine finitely many height-one prime ideals. Each is principal; the product of their generators gives $f$, and removing repeated factors makes it reduced. This also covers a globally irreducible hypersurface that has several local branches at a singular point.

A divisor on a complex manifold is a locally finite formal sum $D={\sum }_Y{n}_{Y}Y$ of irreducible analytic hypersurfaces with integer coefficients. On a sufficiently small $U_{\alpha }$, local defining functions give a meromorphic equation $f_{\alpha }$ for $D$. The quotients $f_{\alpha }/f_{\beta }$ are nowhere-zero holomorphic functions. Gluing frames byproduces the holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor $[D]$, and $f_{\alpha }{e}_{\alpha }$ gives its canonical meromorphic section with divisor $D$.

The Euler sequence on complex projective spaceimplies $\det T{\mathbb{CP}}^n\cong \mathcal{O}(n+1)$. Taking the dual determinant yields the canonical bundle of complex projective spacewhere $H$ is a hyperplane divisor.

The hypotheses on the homogeneous polynomial $p$ say thatis a smooth projective hypersurface of degree $k$, so its divisor line bundle is $[V]\cong \mathcal{O}(kH)$. The adjunction formula givesThis is the canonical bundle of a smooth projective hypersurface.

Now fix an isomorphism $\Phi :[P]\to [Q]$ and regard $s_P$ and ${\Phi }^{-1}{s}_Q$ as holomorphic sections of the same holomorphic line bundle. They have no common zero because $P\ne Q$. Their homogeneous coordinates therefore define a well-defined holomorphic mapIn a local frame, the quotientis a meromorphic function with divisor $(f)=P-Q$. Thus $F^{-1}(0)=P$ and $F^{-1}(\infty )=Q$, both with multiplicity one. The degree of a holomorphic map $F$ is therefore one. A nonconstant degree-one holomorphic map between compact connected Riemann surfaces is a biholomorphism, so the displayed map is biholomorphic.

The divisor on a complex manifold of a nonzero global meromorphic function records its zero and pole orders along irreducible analytic hypersurfaces. It is called principal. Its holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor is trivial: choosing the same global meromorphic function as the local equation on every open set gives identity transition functions. In particular, two hyperplanes in Complex projective space have isomorphic associated bundles, since the quotient of their homogeneous linear equations is a global meromorphic function with their difference as divisor.