Let be the number of states and put
The absolute L2 spectral gap of a reversible Markov chain is ; in this question the relaxation time means the absolute relaxation time. For a nonlazy reversible Markov chain, it may differ from the reciprocal of the ordinary spectral gap . For a finite irreducible Markov chain that is an aperiodic Markov chain, .
For , choose a real eigenfunction whose eigenvalue has modulus , and an initial state maximizing . It has , and the definition of total variation distance implies
This is the eigenvalue lower bound for total variation mixing, . At , for ,
The second inequality follows from , the supplied inequality with . Since ,
When the left side is zero, so no logarithm of zero is needed. For the left side is nonpositive and the conclusion is automatic. A one-state chain has mixing time zero; with the convention the bound is again trivial.
Use the ratio definition of cutoff from part (a), and write . In the reversible Markov chain setting of the preceding parts let and . In particular .
If did not tend to infinity, there would be a subsequence and for which . Along it part (c) implies, for every fixed ,
Since , choose fixed so small that . The lower limit of this ratio is then greater than one, contradicting cutoff for Markov chains. Thus the Peres product condition holds:
In fact the argument with proves the stronger absolute-gap product condition. Part (d) does not repeat the reversible Markov chain hypothesis; the ordinary real ordering of eigenvalues above uses that hypothesis. If arbitrary chains are intended, define the spectral gap explicitly: the eigenvalue lower bound for total variation mixing works for complex eigenfunctions too, and proves the same assertion for or for , which is at least . No real ordering of complex eigenvalues is implicit.
For the requested counterexample take nonlazy simple random walk on the complete graph , . Let have every row equal to the uniform distribution on a finite set, and let . Then
Thus and : every fixed-level mixing time is eventually one. This is a bounded-time jump satisfying the ratio definition of cutoff. The ordinary spectral gap is and the absolute one is , so both products with tend to one, not infinity. The divergence assumption on is therefore essential under this convention.
Peres product condition 2026-10-06
For finite irreducible Markov chains that are aperiodic Markov chains and reversible Markov chains, the ratio definition of cutoff and imply the Peres product condition, with . If on a subsequence, then and the eigenvalue lower bound for total variation mixing give
For sufficiently small fixed , this contradicts the limit one forced by cutoff for Markov chains. The same argument proves the stronger conclusion .