A Euclidean domain admits division with remainder measured by a decreasing Euclidean function.
For a field , polynomial division makes the one-variable polynomial ring a Euclidean domain with Euclidean function equal to the polynomial degree. For a divisor , subtract a suitable scalar multiple of to cancel the leading coefficient of the current remainder. Its degree strictly decreases. Iteration terminates at , where or . Division by the leading coefficient is valid because it is nonzero in a field.
Let be a Euclidean domain with Euclidean function , and let be a nonzero ideal. Choose minimizing the nonnegative integer . For , divide with or . Since , the latter case contradicts minimality. Hence every is a multiple of , giving . The zero ideal is , so every ideal is a principal ideal and is a principal ideal domain.
The ring of integers is a Euclidean domain for . In its lattice choose the nearest row, whose imaginary-coordinate error is at most , then the nearest point on that row, whose real-coordinate error is at most . Every complex number is thus within squared distance of a lattice point, giving Euclidean division. The suborder has the nonprincipal ideal and consequently is not a Euclidean domain for any Euclidean function.
A Euclidean function on an integral domain assigns a nonnegative integer to every nonzero element so that, for with , there are satisfying and either or .
A Gaussian integer has the form with . Its multiplicative norm is , which makes a Euclidean domain.
The product of a Gaussian integer with its complex conjugate. It is multiplicative: , which gives the Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity.
An odd Gaussian integer is primary when it satisfies the displayed congruence. The four units have distinct images in , a group of order four; hence every odd ideal has a unique primary generator. Indeed and .
If is a Gaussian integer and is a nonzero prime ideal of , then is a finite field. Complex conjugation preserves , so a nonzero gives the positive integer . Primality supplies a rational prime . Since satisfies the monic polynomial , the ring is a quotient of and has at most elements. It is a finite integral domain, hence a field. The proof does not require to be a principal ideal domain.
For a primitive cube root of unity , the Eisenstein integers form the triangular lattice
Their multiplicative norm is .
For an Eisenstein integer , with , the norm is . It is a positive integer for , since , and is multiplicative by the multiplicativity of the complex modulus. An element is a unit exactly when its norm is one: one direction follows from multiplicativity and integrality, and the other from the inverse .
Let be a prime number dividing , and set . The case is . For , use
The Eisenstein integer divides this product, but divides neither factor: divisibility by the rational integer in the basis requires both integer coefficients to be divisible by , whereas the second coefficients are and . Thus is not a prime element of .
The Euclidean norm on the Eisenstein integers makes this ring a principal ideal domain. Since irreducible elements of a principal ideal domain are prime, admits a factorization into two nonunits. The positive integral Eisenstein norm is multiplicative, and its value is one exactly on units: when , its complex conjugate is an inverse. Thus and , forcing both norms to be . Writing proves the displayed representation.
Every complex number can be written uniquely as with real , where . Round separately to integers . The error is with , and
For Eisenstein integers with , apply this to to choose . The remainder is an Eisenstein integer and if nonzero. Thus the Eisenstein norm is a Euclidean function and these integers form a Euclidean domain. Coordinate rounding suffices; no closest-point theorem is needed.
Figure 1. . The translated error lies in the blue parallelogram, whose farthest corners have squared modulus . The dashed unit circle lies strictly outside the error bound. Details.

Ancestors (7)

  1. Principal ideal domain
  2. Integral domain
  3. Commutative algebra
  4. Algebra
  5. Area of mathematics
  6. Mathematics
  7. Home

Discussion (0) New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

Articles by others on the same topic (1)