First realize the free isometric action. Choose generators of the finitely presented group . In every dimension , the connected sum
has fundamental group the free group . Map its generators onto the and take the connected regular covering corresponding to the kernel. Its deck transformation group is . Lift any Riemannian metric on to . Deck transformations are then Riemannian isometries, and a deck transformation fixing one point is the identity by uniqueness of lifts. This gives the free isometric realization of a finitely generated group. For the trivial group use . If is infinite the covering manifold need not be compact, which is allowed in this first construction. Simple connectivity of is not being asserted here.
The requested nonhomeomorphism conclusion needs an extra hypothesis. For a counterexample even with distinct subgroups, take , and . They are conjugate and therefore Gassman equivalent. For every free isometric action of , the conjugating element induces a Riemannian isometry . These quotients cannot be nonhomeomorphic. Identical subgroups give an even simpler obstruction. Thus the stated equivalence condition alone cannot imply the claimed topology.
A sufficient version is: for a finite with Gassmann equivalent, nonisomorphic subgroups , there are closed isospectral manifolds with fundamental groups , and hence they are not homeomorphic. To prove it, realize as the fundamental group of a closed smooth manifold of dimension four. Here is the needed closed-manifold realization of a finitely presented fundamental group. Start with a four-dimensional zero-handle and one one-handle for each generator. Attach two-handles along disjoint embedded boundary circles representing the relators, with arbitrary framings. The boundary is three-dimensional, so finitely many such loops can be chosen disjoint. The resulting compact handle manifold has by the Seifert-van Kampen theorem.
The inclusion is surjective on fundamental groups: relative to the boundary the dual handle decomposition uses only handles of indices two, three and four, none of which introduces a fundamental-group generator. Double along its boundary. In the amalgamated product for the double, both boundary maps are the same surjection onto , so the two copies of are identified completely and . The double is closed, connected and smooth after smoothing its collar. This construction works in any dimension at least four; it does not claim that every finitely presented group is a closed three-manifold group.
Let now be the universal cover of with the lifted metric. Since is finite, is compact and simply connected, with a free isometric deck action of . By Sunada theorem, are isospectral. Because is their universal cover, . Nonisomorphic fundamental groups rule out a homeomorphism. For an infinite the same qualified argument applies to finite-index subgroups with equal coset characters: divide first by the intersection of their finite-index subgroup cores, producing a compact intermediate cover and a finite isometry group to which Sunada applies.
For explicit nonhomeomorphic examples, let be an odd prime. Let , and let be the Heisenberg group over a prime field, whose elements are triples with multiplication
Both have order , and every nonidentity element has order . For , induction gives
so the assertion follows at , since is odd. But is abelian and is not: and do not commute.
Embed both groups regularly in . Every nonidentity element in either regular representation has cycle type . Hence both embedded subgroups meet the identity class once, the class of that cycle type times, and all other classes zero times. They are nonisomorphic Gassmann equivalent regular subgroups. Taking and using the closed four-manifold construction with gives an explicit pair of isospectral nonhomeomorphic quotients, completing the intended construction under a sufficient hypothesis.
Finally choose distinct odd primes and take
Conjugacy classes in a direct product are products of classes, so their intersection counts factor. Thus all subgroups are Gassmann equivalent. They are pairwise nonisomorphic: the unique Sylow -subgroup of is its th factor, and whether it is abelian records . Realize as the fundamental group of a closed four-manifold and quotient its universal cover by these subgroups. The binary family of nonhomeomorphic Sunada quotients gives
This existence statement is valid; the earlier universal nonhomeomorphism assertion from Gassmann equivalence alone is not.
Construct the free product from the empty word and all finite alternating words , whose syllables in a free product are nonidentity elements of tagged copies of , with adjacent syllables from different factors. Multiply by concatenating, multiplying adjacent elements in the same factor, and deleting identities until the word is reduced. The normal form theorem for a free product gives a unique result; reducing three concatenated words gives the same result under either parenthesization, so multiplication is associative. The empty word is the identity, and the inverse reverses the word and inverts each syllable. Each factor embeds as words of length one.
The universal property of a free product says that for every group and group homomorphisms there is a unique group homomorphism extending both. Explicitly, send a reduced word to the product of its syllable images; reduction preserves this product. This gives existence, while generation by the two factors gives uniqueness.
A standard form of Klein's combination theorem, or the ping-pong lemma, is the following. Let nontrivial subgroups of the homeomorphisms of a topological space have disjoint nonempty subsets with
Assume also that at least one factor has at least three elements. Then the generated subgroup is . The cardinality hypothesis cannot simply be omitted: the same involution swapping two disjoint sets would otherwise provide a counterexample with both factors equal to .
Here is the ping-pong lemma proof. A reduced word of odd length begins and ends in the same factor, so repeated application of the displayed inclusions sends the other factor's domain into that factor's domain. Disjointness shows that the word is not the identity. For an even reduced word, relabel the factors so that , and invert the word if necessary to make it begin with and end in . Choose . The conjugate reduces to an odd-length word beginning with and ending with , both in , so it is nontrivial. Thus no nonempty reduced word lies in the kernel of the natural group homomorphism , proving the theorem.
For an explicit example, let be the one-dimensional Real projective space, and take the Möbius transformations
For every nonzero integer , sends into , while sends into . Indeed when , and . Both transformations have infinite order. Hence the ping-pong lemma gives , a free product of two nontrivial finitely presented groups.
A finitely presented group admits a group presentation with both and finite; it is the quotient of the free group on by the normal closure of . If
with disjoint generator sets, then
Maps from this group presentation to any group are exactly pairs of maps from and , so the universal property of a free product proves the formula.
For a group homomorphism , choose a word representing for each . The presentation of a semidirect product is
The presentation maps onto the specified semidirect product. Conversely, its conjugation relations allow any word to be written as a word from followed by one from . The natural maps from the two factors to the presented group satisfy the full action relation, because conjugation agrees with first on generators and hence on all elements. They define the reverse group homomorphism . The two maps are inverse on every generator, proving the group isomorphism. There are finitely many cross-relations, so the result is again a finitely presented group.
Apply this to the specified permutation action. The presentation is
Eliminate and . The last cross-relation becomes , already implied by . Thus
Both factors are nontrivial finitely presented groups, as required.
Let . The group action by left multiplication on gives a group homomorphism . Its kernel is the normal core of a subgroup,
The containment follows by looking at the stabilizer of the coset , and finite index follows from the finite image in .
The Higman group is
It is visibly a finitely presented group. To prove infinitude, first form
It is the amalgamated free product of and , identifying their infinite cyclic subgroups generated by . Each factor is an HNN extension of an infinite cyclic group, so its base and stable letter both have infinite order. No nonzero power of belongs to in the first factor, by the map to sending to one and to zero. In the second factor, no nonzero power of belongs to : the stable-letter map forces a hypothetical equality to have , and the base has infinite order. The normal form theorem for an amalgamated free product therefore shows that is a rank-two free group.
Similarly,
contains as a rank-two free group. Identifying these two free subgroups yields
The normal form theorem for an amalgamated free product embeds in . In particular, contains a free group of rank two and is infinite.
The finite quotients of cyclic squaring presentations argument now rules out every nontrivial finite quotient of . In a finite image, a relation forces the order of to be odd, since conjugate elements have the same order. If any generator has nontrivial image, let be the least prime number dividing the order of any of the four generator images, and choose whose order is divisible by . Its predecessor conjugates it to its square. If is the order of , iterating conjugation gives . Hence the multiplicative order of modulo divides . It is greater than one and divides , so it has a prime factor smaller than , which also divides . This contradicts the minimal choice of . Thus all four generator images are trivial. has no nontrivial finite quotient, and the normal-core argument above implies that has no proper finite-index subgroup.
For the final argument, Conjugation preserves the order of an element. Thus if one nonidentity element has finite order , every nonidentity element has that same order, and . Moreover is prime: if a prime factor properly divides , then is nonidentity but has the smaller order .
When , the element is nonidentity, so choose with . The conjugator is not the identity, since , and therefore . Induction gives , and at this yields
But Fermat's little theorem, with the odd prime , gives , contradicting that divisibility.
For , is not in the nonidentity conjugacy class, so the required conjugator cannot be chosen. Instead, a group in which every element has square one is an abelian group: also equals . In an abelian group every conjugacy class is a singleton, so one nonidentity class permits only one nonidentity element, giving a group of order two. This contradicts infinitude. Consequently the infinite group in question is a .
A poly-infinite cyclic group has a finite subnormal series all of whose nontrivial factors are infinite cyclic groups. Intersecting its series with a subgroup again gives trivial or infinite cyclic factors; repetitions may be deleted. Splicing a kernel series with the preimage of a quotient series proves closure under extensions. Such groups are finitely presented groups: induct on the series, split the last extension by an infinite cyclic quotient, and use finite presentation of a semidirect product.
Let be a nontrivial simple group inside a finitely presented group , and fix in . For an input word in , enumerate products of conjugates in of and proofs in that such a product equals . This search terminates exactly when : the normal closure of a nontrivial element of is all of , and its conjugators are also elements of , while a null word has only trivial conjugates. Run this search alongside the enumerable proofs that . Exactly one search terminates, solving the word problem for a group on any specified finitely generated subgroup of . No effective generating set for the possibly infinitely generated is needed.