Coherent-state overlap 2026-10-20
Expand both states in the Fock basis and sum the exponential series to obtain the displayed overlap. In particular . Distinct coherent states are nonorthogonal at finite separation; dropping this overlap can give incorrect normalization and small-amplitude limits.
An ideal cross-Kerr interaction between two single modes is , with . The number operators commute with the interaction, so this coupling changes phases without transferring photons between the modes. To implement the specified positive conditional phase, use
where within the one-photon polarization subspace. The horizontal branch has zero interacting occupation. Since , the specified conditional rotation follows. This is an ideal lossless single-mode model; an actual travelling-wave medium's bandwidth, loss and noise are not established by writing this Hamiltonian.
Use and . A coherent state has centre and variance in either optical quadrature. Multiplication of by rotates that centre anticlockwise through , keeping the coherent state noise disk unchanged. For real positive the two centres are and .
Normalize the initial polarization of an electromagnetic wave qubit. The output of the medium is
The joint state is generally an entangled state. The overlap magnitude is . The state factorizes when the amplitudes coincide, while nearly distinguishable amplitudes make the polarization nearly maximally entangled with the optical mode. Before any polarization conditioning, tracing out mode 2 gives the mixture , with no interference between branches.
Include the normalization factors in the half-wave plate map: and . The transformed joint state is
Conditioning on a vertical result and setting therefore prepares
This pure optical cat state is the conditional output; it is not the unconditioned reduced state immediately after the Kerr medium. The measurement erases the polarization label, allowing the two amplitudes to interfere. The calculated optical Wigner functions below display the resulting fringes; their negative regions are quasiprobability, not negative detection probabilities. These illustrative plots choose : the rotation panel uses , while the cat panels use the conditional Kerr rotation and three different relative phases .
The coherent-state overlap follows by expanding in the Fock basis:
Thus and
The postselection probability for Kerr-cat preparation includes both the normalized input qubit and the wave plate. At the vertical branch has zero probability and no normalized conditional state. For the remaining calculation take real, as required.
Figure 1.
Original coherent-state rotation and calculated phase-space interference of three conditional cat states
. Details.
Using , put . Directly evaluating diagonal and cross terms gives
The last quantity is the mean photon number in the conditional cat, which differs from the input coherent state mean . Since ,
However, its first moment is
which is generally nonzero. The original PDF's assertion of a zero mean for arbitrary is inconsistent with its stated pure state. Consequently its displayed expression is the second moment, not the general variance. The phase-dependent cat-state quadrature variance is
The printed result does become the variance for , notably the even and odd cat states. It could also describe an ensemble mixing equal weights of and : that different state's mean vanishes while its second moment is unchanged. Such phase averaging is not part of the specified pure-state preparation.
For nonzero finite , and . The correct quadrature squeezing condition in this quadrature is therefore
For a representative phase in , this is . If instead one applies the printed second moment as a variance, the resulting condition is , or modulo . That is sufficient, but not necessary, for the actual pure state's squeezing. For example, at , while . This explicitly tests the difference.
For a fixed phase other than modulo , expand
As the input mean number , the normalized state tends to vacuum, and
This expansion is nonuniform near the odd-cat phase. At exactly the vacuum terms cancel and the normalized odd coherent-state superposition tends to , giving , while its postselection probability tends to zero. The even coherent-state superposition at instead contains only even photon numbers and tends smoothly to vacuum.
At large input mean number, , the two coherent state branches become nearly orthogonal, and for every fixed phase. The mean tends to zero as well. This does not make the state an incoherent mixture: phase-space interference still distinguishes the ideal quantum superposition, although its contribution to this low-order moment is exponentially small. The loss of coherence in an optical cat state arises when ordinary loss reveals the branch to the environment and suppresses that interference, with factor for transmissivity .
For the especially simple even cat,
It starts at , falls to about at , and returns towards from below. The odd-cat curve decreases from towards from above. Other fixed-phase curves have the small- and large-amplitude limits derived above; for negative , squeezing ends when . In balanced homodyne detection, centre each quadrature distribution on its measured mean before inferring its variance.
Figure 2.
Calculated cat-state quadrature means, true variances, and the amplitude-dependent squeezing boundary
. Details.