Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 47 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Take and . The Sine-Gordon kink-antikink scattering solution tends to the same vacuum at both spatial ends and hence has zero net topological charge. At large , the two transition centers, found by setting the magnitude of the inverse-tangent argument to one, obeyThey are a kink and an antikink moving with asymptotic speeds , with no outgoing radiation. Their left-right orientations interchange at the collision. To define the soliton time delay, label a transmitted trajectory by its preserved rapidity rather than its left-right position. The right-moving asymptotes areAfter restoring physical lengths, the forward shift is . The arrival-time difference is thereforeThis is a time advance relative to the extrapolated incoming free motion.
The semiclassical scattering phase. For an outgoing energy wave packet with full S-matrix phase , stationary phase in shifts its arrival time by . The full S-matrix phase from a classical soliton delay uses the paper's , twice the phase in a convention . In the center-of-momentum frame, , so . It follows thatThe literal PDF normalization gives and consequentlyThe integrable logarithmic singularity at zero causes no divergence of this phase difference. With the intended standard angular-field prefactor , the result is insteadThe soliton time delay determines only phase differences, not an energy-independent constant or a choice of branch. Keeping this distinction avoids an arbitrary high-energy subtraction.
Bound-state poles. Set . Each factor of the exact amplitude can be written . Its denominator vanishes in the physical rapidity strip atThe corresponding numerator is nonzero, and no other numerator cancels the pole. In the direct kink–antikink fusion interpretation, analytically continue the constituent rapidities to . Their momenta sum to , so the relativistic bound-state mass from a rapidity pole givesThese neutral particles form the Sine-Gordon breather spectrum at reflectionless couplings: there are breathers, none for , and the putative state is at the unbound threshold. The amplitude fixes these ratios to the physical kink mass; its rapidity dependence alone cannot fix the overall mass scale or a mass-renormalization prescription relating that mass to .
It is important to distinguish direct and crossed interpretations rather than count every occurrence of a pole twice. Crossing symmetry sends to . At the original angle the momentum-difference invariant is , so the crossed interpretation exchanges the complementary member of the same tower. In particular the transmission residue alternates sign: direct evaluation of the remaining factors gives , . Thus one must retain charge-channel/crossed-channel information, not reject every negative-imaginary transmission residue or declare an additional particle for a crossed pole. Direct and crossed locations coincide in the reflectionless pole set. The familiar case has one breather of mass despite the negative-imaginary transmission residue; this diagonal reflectionless example is also displayed in Castro-Alvaredo, Chen, Doyon and Hoogeveen, section 4.2.
Matching the exact phase. For the unwrapped reflectionless sine-Gordon transmission phase, at real choose the continuous unwrapped branch with . ThenEvery factor has unit modulus, consistent with purely transmitting elastic scattering. Differentiating is simpler than integrating its complex logarithm:For fixed the sum becomes a Riemann sum, and the elementary integral yieldsSince and , replacing by changes this only at subleading order. The leading phase difference agrees with the standard semiclassical result. The derivative approximation is not uniform as at fixed ; integrating its logarithm gives a finite leading phase difference nevertheless. A compatible constant is the given branch , whose choice is supplied by the exact amplitude rather than the classical trajectory.
As a useful endpoint check, , obtained by expanding the two logarithms . Thus the leading phase with coefficient tends to . The exact unwrapped endpoints arewhere the extra is subleading. Neither should be replaced by zero by an unannounced branch convention. Finally, the literal action gives a phase derivative of order , whereas the printed exact amplitude gives order . The requested exact/semiclassical matching requires correcting the overall action normalization to . This is an actual inconsistency between pages 2 and 4, not a change to the sine-Gordon equation or the classical scattering field.