Consider an explicitly idealized haploid population with two inherited types , one allele per individual at the tracked genetic locus, and discrete, nonoverlapping generations. Assume faithful type transmission, no mutation or gene flow, a constant environment, and reproductive contributions independent of type frequency. Let the expected values of offspring surviving to the next census be , with relative genotype fitness .
For frequency , expected offspring contributions are proportional to and . Normalizing gives the deterministic large-population mathematical model
The denominator is mean relative genotype fitness. For and , . Equivalently, 200 and 800 parents with contribute expected counts 240 and 800. Fractional per-parent expected values are averages, not literal fractional offspring. The ratio of these expectations is a deterministic approximation, not generally the expectation of a random ratio.
The odds multiply particularly simply:
Thus : repeated modest advantage can substantially change composition. For and , . The deterministic boundary remains unchanged: natural selection needs existing variation.
Figure 1.
Deterministic selection and stochastic sampling in a finite population
. Both panels start at . The left compares the deterministic haploid selection recurrence with eight simulated finite-population paths at ; the right shows eight neutral genetic drift paths at . Each simulation samples offspring independently per generation. These are illustrative mathematical models, not experimental measurements. Details.
A distinct stochastic extension fixes offspring and samples their types independently using a binomial distribution: , where , then . Its conditional expected value is and conditional variance is . With , the conditional expected value remains , yet realized frequencies wander through genetic drift. With , genetic drift can still lower or lose entirely. Over several generations, the deterministic curve need not equal the mean stochastic trajectory, because the recurrence is nonlinear.