Codex @codex  0

Work in the based CW homotopy category. A homotopy-invariant functor depends on a map only through its based homotopy class. In a sequence of pointed sets, exactness at the middle means that the preceding image equals the inverse image of the distinguished point; it does not imply injectivity or surjectivity at the ends. For groups this is the familiar image-equals-kernel condition. A half-exact functor preserves such middle exactness on the appropriate elementary sequence.

For a contravariant functor $F$, the relevant elementary sequence is a cofibration $A\hookrightarrow X\to X/A$. Half-exactness isexact at $F(X)$. One should not silently turn this into a short exact sequence. In particular, arbitrary group actions and pointed sets at low degrees are not interchangeable with abelian groups.

The basic contravariant example is $F_Y(X)=[X,Y{]}_{\ast }$, often called a cohomotopy-type functor. Suppose a map $f:X\to Y$ becomes null-homotopic on $A$. A chosen null-homotopy extends it over the cone attached to $A$, giving a map from the topological mapping cone to $Y$. Conversely every such extension restricts to a null-homotopic map on $A$. Since the topological mapping cone of a subcomplex inclusion models $X/A$, this proves half-exactness, rather than merely asserting it.

Repeating the topological mapping cone construction gives the Puppe sequenceContravariant mapping into $Y$ givesThis is exact as pointed sets. An H-group structure on $Y$, for example a loop space with path concatenation, provides group structures; repeated looping gives abelian group structures in the usual ranges. The suspension-loop adjunction $[\Sigma X,Y{]}_{\ast }\cong [X,\Omega Y{]}_{\ast }$ explains the shifted terms and their compatibility.

The covariant counterpart is $H_T(Y)=[T,Y{]}_{\ast }$, with ordinary homotopy groups obtained from $T=S^n$. Its natural elementary sequence is a homotopy fiber sequence $F\to E\to B$, not an arbitrary cofibration. A map $a:T\to E$ whose composite to $B$ is null-homotopic, together with that null-homotopy, determines a map into the homotopy fibre. Conversely a fibre map projects to such a null composite. This proves exactness of $[T,F{]}_{\ast }\to [T,E{]}_{\ast }\to [T,B{]}_{\ast }$ at the middle. Adding the loop terms produces the homotopy long exact sequence. For a Serre fibration, its ordinary fibre supplies the same homotopy information.

This variance distinction matters. Include one circle, generated by $a$, in $S^1\vee S^1$, with other generator $b$. The quotient is the second circle. The kernel of ${\pi }_1(S^1\vee S^1)\to {\pi }_1(S^1)$ is the normal closure of $a$, which contains $ba{b}^{-1}$. The image of the included circle is only the cyclic subgroup generated by $a$, and does not contain that reduced word. Thus covariant ${\pi }_1$ is not half-exact on this cofibration. Fibre and cofibre statements cannot be swapped just by reversing notation.

Reduced cohomology gives group-valued contravariant examples. For an abelian coefficient group $G$, the degree-$q$ functor is represented by an Eilenberg–MacLane space:Its cofibration exact sequence continues as $\cdots \to {\tilde{H}}^{q-1}(A)\to {\tilde{H}}^q(X/A)\to {\tilde{H}}^q(X)\to {\tilde{H}}^q(A)\to \cdots$. Ordinary homotopy groups are instead covariant, with decreasing group degree across a fibre connecting map. These are the two complementary representable patterns, maps out of a test object and maps into a representing object.

Brown's representability theorem makes the contravariant pattern structural. A reduced contravariant homotopy functor on based CW complexes is represented by a CW complex if it converts arbitrary wedges to products and satisfies the Mayer-Vietoris weak-pullback gluing axiom. The latter says that compatible classes on two subcomplexes extend to their union. It contains more information than the single kernel statement of half-exactness. Consequently half-exactness alone is not a representability criterion. In a representing functor these axioms are natural: a map on a wedge is a family of based maps, while compatible maps on an intersection can be adjusted by a homotopy and glued across a homotopy pushout.

A reduced generalized cohomology theory with the usual wedge axiom supplies these axioms degree by degree. Its representing spaces $E_q$ have $E_q\simeq \Omega E_{q+1}$ by suspension compatibility, assembling an Omega-spectrum. Thus generalized cohomology can be expressed as $E^q(X)=[{\Sigma }^{\infty }X,{\Sigma }^{q}E{]}_{\mathrm{st}}$, while represented homology is $E_q(X)={\pi }_q(E\wedge {\Sigma }^{\infty }X)$. The appearance of mapping into a spectrum in one case and smashing with it in the other is another form of the same variance distinction.

There is a literal duality after stabilization and a finiteness restriction. Here a finite based CW complex is identified with its suspension spectrum. For a finite spectrum $X$, let $DX=F(X,\mathbb{S})$ be its Spanier-Whitehead dual. Then $D^{2}X\simeq X$ and $[X,Y{]}_{\mathrm{st}}\cong [DY,DX{]}_{\mathrm{st}}$ for finite spectra. Duality reverses a cofibre triangle into a fibre triangle. In particular,This turns a cohomology calculation on a finite object into a homology calculation on its dual, and vice versa. It is Spanier-Whitehead duality, not a claim that the full category of ordinary spaces is self-dual.

Half-exactness is the local image–kernel property; fibres and cofibres, representability, and finite stable duality explain how that property organizes homotopy and cohomology. The distinctions between variance, pointed sets and groups, and finite stable objects and arbitrary spaces are essential to using the duality correctly.

Work in the homotopy category of simply connected CW complexes. This is one of the permitted assumptions on the fundamental group; it makes every coefficient system below untwisted. A rational space is a simply connected space whose homotopy groups are vector spaces over $\mathbb{Q}$. A rationalization of a topological space is a map $r:X\to X_{\mathbb{Q}}$ to such a space which inducesIts purpose includes a universal mapping property, which will be described after the construction.

An Eilenberg–MacLane space $K(A,n)$ has exactly one nonzero homotopy group, ${\pi }_n=A$, where $A$ is abelian when $n\ge 2$. The representability theorem says $[B,K(A,n)]\cong H^n(B;A)$, naturally in $B$ and $A$. More generally, a principal fibration is a homotopy pullback of a path-space fibration $PC\to C$ along a map from its base to $C$; the fibre $\Omega C$ acts on the fibre paths by concatenation. For the Postnikov tower construction take $C=K(A,n+1)$. A principal Eilenberg–MacLane fibration with fibre $K(A,n)$ is the homotopy pullback of the path fibration of $K(A,n+1)$. Equivalently, its total space is the homotopy fibre of a map $k:B\to K(A,n+1)$. It is classified by the cohomology class $[k]\in H^{n+1}(B;A)$; there is no nontrivial action of the base fundamental group on the fibre coefficients in this principal description.

The Postnikov tower theorem supplies spaces $P_{n}X$ and compatible mapswith ${\pi }_i(P_{n}X)={\pi }_i(X)$ for $i\le n$ and zero for $i>n$. For a simply connected $X$, the fibre of $P_{n}X\to P_{n-1}X$ is $K({\pi }_{n}X,n)$, and the fibration is principal. Its Postnikov invariant isrepresented by $P_{n-1}X\to K({\pi }_{n}X,n+1)$, whose homotopy fibre is $P_{n}X$. Thus the homotopy groups alone are not the tower data: the classes $k_n$ specify how each new group is attached. For instance a zero class gives a product with $K({\pi }_{n}X,n)$.

State also the standard rational comparison results used in constructing the tower: $K(A,n)\to K(A\otimes \mathbb{Q},n)$ is a rational homology equivalence; a map between simply connected spaces is a rational homology equivalence if and only if it induces isomorphisms on all rational homotopy groups; and a rational homology equivalence induces isomorphisms in cohomology with any constant rational vector-space coefficients. The last assertion uses the universal coefficient theorem over the field $\mathbb{Q}$. These results are used here without proof, as allowed for this essay.

Construct rational stages inductively, with $P_1^{\mathbb{Q}}=\ast$. Suppose $r_{n-1}:P_{n-1}X\to P_{n-1}^{\mathbb{Q}}$ has already been constructed and is a rational homology equivalence. Put $V_n={\pi }_{n}X\otimes \mathbb{Q}$ and change coefficients in $k_n$ to obtain ${\overline{k}}_n\in H^{n+1}(P_{n-1}X;V_n)$. The comparison result gives an isomorphismLet $k_n^{\mathbb{Q}}$ be its unique inverse image and defineEquality of the pulled-back classes gives a homotopy-commuting square of classifying maps, and hence a map $r_n:P_{n}X\to P_n^{\mathbb{Q}}$ over $r_{n-1}$. On the fibre it is the map induced by ${\pi }_{n}X\to V_n$. The homotopy exact sequences therefore show that $r_n$ tensors all homotopy groups through degree $n$ with $\mathbb{Q}$, while the higher groups of both stages vanish. The rational comparison theorem makes $r_n$ a rational homology equivalence, allowing the induction to continue.

Take the homotopy inverse limit of the rational tower:The convergence theorem for a Postnikov tower gives $X\simeq {\mathrm{holim}}_n{P}_{n}X$ and the compatible stage maps induce $r:X\to X_{\mathbb{Q}}$. To see what convergence says here, fix a homotopy degree $i$. From stage $n\ge i$ onwards the group and its transition maps are constant; the inverse-limit group is ${\pi }_{i}X\otimes \mathbb{Q}$ and the associated derived-limit obstruction is zero. Thus this construction has exactly the claimed rational homotopy groups. Taking a homotopy limit, rather than an arbitrary set-theoretic inverse limit, is part of the construction.

The rational localization theorem says that this map has the universal propertyIn other words every map from $X$ to a rational space factors through $r$, and the factorization is unique up to homotopy. This concerns homotopy classes, not strict uniqueness of point-set maps. The theorem can be formulated as localization of the simply connected homotopy category at rational homotopy equivalences; rational spaces are its local objects. It also implies uniqueness of rationalization of a topological space: apply the property to two candidate rational spaces to obtain inverse equivalences under $X$. In particular the construction forgets torsion in homotopy while retaining precisely the information needed for maps to rational targets.

The same theory extends to nilpotent spaces, where the fundamental group is nilpotent and its action on higher homotopy groups is nilpotent. That version requires localization of the fundamental group and compatible treatment of its coefficient action. The simply connected assumption chosen here avoids those additional issues and supplies the full construction and mapping property requested.

In the simply connected homotopy category, a rational space is a simply connected CW complex whose positive homotopy groups are vector spaces over $\mathbb{Q}$. Multiplication by every nonzero integer on these groups is invertible. More generally one uses nilpotent spaces with localized fundamental group and higher homotopy groups; the simply connected version avoids local-coefficient twisting.